Misplaced Pages

User talk:The Hungry Hun: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:21, 19 September 2006 editALM scientist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,390 edits 3RR violation WARNING for [] article← Previous edit Revision as of 22:40, 19 September 2006 edit undoAlphachimp (talk | contribs)29,194 edits User notice: temporary 3RR blockNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
== The picture in Muhammad article == == The picture in Muhammad article ==
The picture in Muhammad article is not related to conquest of Mecca at all. The incident happened even before Muhammad was a Prophet and Mecca is conquest decades after that. Tell me why you want to add picture when you have no idea that what that picture is about??? Btw I have reported you as you have done enough reverts. --- ] 22:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC) The picture in Muhammad article is not related to conquest of Mecca at all. The incident happened even before Muhammad was a Prophet and Mecca is conquest decades after that. Tell me why you want to add picture when you have no idea that what that picture is about??? Btw I have reported you as you have done enough reverts. --- ] 22:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;">
:
{| class="user-block"
|| ]
|| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
|}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 16 hours. are the reverts in question. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)</div>

Revision as of 22:40, 19 September 2006

3RR violation WARNING for Muhammad article

You have already violate 3RR. Be aware that you could be banned if you continue to do that. Hence stop reverting -- ابراهيم 22:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

The picture in Muhammad article

The picture in Muhammad article is not related to conquest of Mecca at all. The incident happened even before Muhammad was a Prophet and Mecca is conquest decades after that. Tell me why you want to add picture when you have no idea that what that picture is about??? Btw I have reported you as you have done enough reverts. --- ابراهيم 22:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 16 hours. Here are the reverts in question. alphaChimp 22:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)