| Revision as of 04:10, 25 January 2017 editMitch Ames (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers187,183 edits →Melania Trump under new section "Other notable persons" ?: not under Film← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:20, 26 February 2017 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,360 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Slovenia/Archive 1) (botNext edit → |
| Line 36: |
Line 36: |
|
|
|
|
|
=== ____ === |
|
=== ____ === |
|
|
|
|
== Melania Trump under new section "Other notable persons" ? == |
|
|
|
|
|
eg |
|
|
], born Melanija Knavs in Novo Mesto, current First Lady of the USA, married to 45th President Donald Trump. |
|
|
|
|
|
Arguable whether her origin says much about Slovenia or is worth mentioning on Slovenia's wiki page. I think it is ... at least, it's the reason I was interested to look up this page. Presumably others will do the same. ] (]) 00:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
: A separate section is not a good idea, IMO, as long as it mentions only her. If you find some other good section to mention here, go ahead. Culture section lists people but it's already excessively long and I have a long-term plan to heavily trim it at some point. --''']''' 09:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
::If people are led ''to'' the Slovenia page by reading the article about Melania Trump, that's fine, but it doesn't mean they need to be led back ''from'' that page with a link. (There is also no "Notable persons" section at ] listing her husband.) Melania Trump is already included at ], which is probably the most appropriate place to include the information and link. ] (]) 10:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Agree, establishing a separate heading (or anything separate) for her would be an extremely messy solution. This kind of contextless trivia would not improve the quality of this article in the slightes. On the contrary. — ] <sup>]</sup> 10:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
::::She certainly does not belong under ]: . ] (]) 04:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC) |
|
Foreign Office (i.e. British civil authority, but not the military) policy was indeed initially, as you say, in favor of 'hand-over' of the Italian war criminals, but the British and American military authorities in Italy were against it (p.520), but the Foreign Office changed its policy (ibid., p.523), too, when in 1946 the possibility was that Italian communists would win the Italian general election, which would open Italy to Soviet influence, so they decided to drop the case and let Italy do the job (ibid., p.526) resulting in the (highly indicative) fate of Graziani and Roatta (ibid., p.525). The British concern to secure the electoral victory of the Christian Democrats "prompted Britain to drop all of its war crimes claims against Italy" (ibid., p.527). See the screenshots from the scholarly article via JStor.org
References
