| Revision as of 08:53, 20 September 2006 editMER-C (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators250,740 edits delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:43, 20 September 2006 edit undoCynical (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,447 edits DeleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Delete''', non-notable blog. ] | ] 08:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', non-notable blog. ] | ] 08:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per above. ] 08:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per above. ] 08:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' if the subject was notable then the article wouldn't be as rubbish as it is. ] 09:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:43, 20 September 2006
SAMIZDATamerica
Blogs, especially political ones, are a dime a dozen. I don't see what makes this particular one notable. Full disclosure: I prodded this for much the same reason and the tag was removed by the editor with nothing else added. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 00:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. "Samizdatamerica.com" gets exactly ZERO ghits. You can't be much more nn than that. --Aaron 00:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WEB and WP:ADS. Has no alexa ranking --TBCTaLk?!? 00:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non notable blog. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 07:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable blog. JIP | Talk 08:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. MER-C 08:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete if the subject was notable then the article wouldn't be as rubbish as it is. Cynical 09:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)