| Revision as of 19:08, 20 September 2006 editRamsquire (talk | contribs)4,182 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:15, 21 September 2006 edit undoKhoikhoi (talk | contribs)71,605 edits →[]: dNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Delete''' if the subject was notable then the article wouldn't be as rubbish as it is. ] 09:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' if the subject was notable then the article wouldn't be as rubbish as it is. ] 09:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', non notable blog. ] 19:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', non notable blog. ] 19:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' nn. —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]]</span> 03:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:15, 21 September 2006
SAMIZDATamerica
Blogs, especially political ones, are a dime a dozen. I don't see what makes this particular one notable. Full disclosure: I prodded this for much the same reason and the tag was removed by the editor with nothing else added. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 00:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. "Samizdatamerica.com" gets exactly ZERO ghits. You can't be much more nn than that. --Aaron 00:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WEB and WP:ADS. Has no alexa ranking --TBCTaLk?!? 00:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non notable blog. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 07:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable blog. JIP | Talk 08:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. MER-C 08:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete if the subject was notable then the article wouldn't be as rubbish as it is. Cynical 09:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non notable blog. Ramsquire 19:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn. —Khoikhoi 03:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)