Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:35, 8 March 2017

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:TheBD2000 reported by User:Volunteer Marek (Result: Warned user(s))

Page: Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TheBD2000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: (note the response: "Deal with it")

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: (there's a couple discussion on talk. TheBD2000 has not participated in any of them)

Comments:

The user has made seven reverts in the recent past, at least five of these within the last 24 hrs. Note that the fifth revert was made *after* an edit warring warning was made. Judging by their response - "Deal with it" - they appear to have no intention of stopping. This is an edit war against multiple editors (at least three - myself, User:Frederickmsp and User:HelgaStick) Volunteer Marek (talk) 14:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

• Comment I've reviewed this report; the content in dispute is the statement that "... as being similar to lists of 'Jewish' crimes publicized in Nazi Germany." The statement is sourced to this article. The source is an "analysis" piece from the Washington Post "WorldViews" section—an editorial. It's a professional article written by a staff writer for a credible journalistic institution and the facts presented needn't necessarily be questioned, but I don't see anything within the article to support the actual claim that is in dispute. It's the author herself who is drawing the parallel and even she does not draw the comparison unequivocally. Since this is dangerous BLP territory, I'm declining to action and will be involving myself on the talk page instead. Per WP:INVOLVED I cannot rule on this report but it is my opinion that the content in question is dubiously sourced and solidly under the purview of WP:BLP and thus the reverts are exempt. Will expand on the talk page. Swarm ♠ 21:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

First, that isn't the only source. Second, if you're gonna involve yourself then don't close this request as "declined". Third, how is this "BLP"? This is about a freakin' law.Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

I would also like to point out that at no point did TheBD2000 invoke "BLP" (which frankly would've been - and still is - silly, since this is not about a person). And seven reverts is seven reverts, even if one thinks they're right.Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

What you call reverts were actually attempts to compromise notations of reductio ad hitlerum content given that I never saw it to be necessary. I did not edit war because I hardly reverted any edits and only amended them, barely removing any content. If you would like to continue with this issue, I will not agree to stop editing the article entirely, but whatever it is you want me to do, I might do it. TheBD2000 (talk) 21:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

There's seven diffs up there. They're all reverts. You were warned after the fourth one. You kept going. You were warned again. You said "Deal with it!". This is dealing with it. You've edit warred, you knew you were edit warring, you kept on edit warring despite warnings, and you implicitly promised to continue edit warring. Oh, and you failed to participate in the discussion until the last minute.Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

I did not make more than three reverts, Volunteer Marek. Calm the fuck down and keep this civil, please. You're the only one causing people problems. TheBD2000 (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

There's seven diffs right up there, each one of them a revert. And you don't really "calm" anything by telling people to "calm the fuck down", nor are you "keeping things civil". This just throws in WP:BATTLEGROUND along with the edit warring.Volunteer Marek (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

• Warned TheBD2000, I came close to blocking you when this report was opened for your misuse of warning templates and the "notes" you tried to add to the article. Please note that discretionary sanctions covers standards of behavior. NeilN 05:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Speedy135 reported by User:Emir of Misplaced Pages (Result: Blocked 1 week)

Page

Yolanda Hadid (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Bella Hadid (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Speedy135 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. Consecutive edits made from 18:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC) to 18:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
   1. 18:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 768948239 by Emir of Misplaced Pages (talk) stop reverting this fucking page. U are basically reverting it back to let everyone know where they live. USE UR FUCKING BRAIN"
   2. 18:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 768948239 by Emir of Misplaced Pages (talk) stop reverting this fucking page. U are reverting it back to let everyone know where they live. USE UR FUCKING BRAIN if you have one."
2. 18:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 768938398 by Edwardx (talk)"
3. 16:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 768899773 by Emir of Misplaced Pages (talk) You know why I removed it. use brain if you have one"
4. 18:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 768938569 by Edwardx (talk) REMOVED"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 18:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Yolanda Hadid‎. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

• Blocked – for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks and breaching 3RR. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

User:75.164.192.44 reported by User:WNYY98 (Result: Blocked 31 hours)

Page

Clam chowder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

75.164.192.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 01:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC) "Stop adding that! I want to rip your goddamn hair out!"
2. 01:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC) "Stop including the law now! (screams like Goofy)"
3. 01:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC) "PLEASE DON'T MENTION THAT!"
4. 01:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC) "Forget that!"
5. 01:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC) "89898787i"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

• Blocked – for a period of 31 hours Materialscientist (talk) 01:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Samoa Rusev reported by User:LM2000 (Result: Blocked indef)

Page: Bill Goldberg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Samoa Rusev (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Comments: Very likely some sockpuppetry going on here too given similar history by sockpuppet Trepcost.LM2000 (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked indefinitely NeilN 05:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Anioni reported by User:TechnicianGB (Result: Protected for one week)

Page: List of European countries by average wage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Italy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) User being reported: Anioni (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: ] check at how he recalls me on vandalism while he deleted the official EUROSTAT source. ?¿

Diffs of the user's reverts:

and much more editions, which can be seen in his page, he just changes with redundant sources or even without sources and with fake data, for example he used a website which talks about the politicians wages in 2013, and he changed as he wanted the wage on Italy using that source? I warned him on his talk page and he fastly deleted that

He also changed the economic data of the page of Italy with fake numbers even referencing the official IMF source which doesn't say and support the numbers he gave. I changed those numbers he edited to the ones from the official IMF source and he reverted here my change although another user has reverted his change and from that day he didn't edit that page further.

Anioni (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. This user is suspected to be the same user as Sad9721, a user which was banned from Misplaced Pages doing the same redundant editions on the same topics/articles. This time is List of European countries by average wage. He accuses me for being "anti-italian" because I revert his non consensual changes with redundant sources (one source he used was referencing this wikipedia article of the list of european countries as the main source, Misplaced Pages can't be a valid source for a Misplaced Pages article!) then changed it to a source which talks about the politicians wages (nothing related to the article) and then putting fake numbers which can't be found even in his sources and he also said that it's data from 2013. I reverted his changes by putting the official EUROSTAT (european statistic agency, official EU organism) numbers from 2015 on it and he keeps deleting those numbers and changing the aspect of the page.

Also threatens me on the talk page of that article that he will delete any of my changes because "I make them without consensus" (while he started changing the aspect of the page in 28th of February without any kind of consensus and putting redundant sources) and because I just use the official data he calls me that i'm "anti-italian" and "aggresive" and doesn't change his mood, again today he not only changed the data of Spain and Italy in that page, he also deleted their official data from EUROSTAT and also deleted the source! Here are the proves. ] this is when all started, after this edition he maded 19 editions in a row in the page List of European countries by average wage which every one of it was an redundant edition without trustworthy sources. Then I changed his editions to the official sources and all started.

In his profile can be seen that he just edits the same topics, I warned him on his talk page and he directly deleted it and keeping in the same mood. He went to warn EdJohnston about "my vandalism" and EdJohnston said the same to him, that I tried to change his mood in his talk page and he deleted it. He also maded editions on the page of Italy by faking the official IMF economic numbers of Italy and changing the numbers while the numbers are referenced with the official IMF source, he changed them even if that's not what the page of IMF says and then when I reverted his edition with fake numbers he reverted mine again! ] and here is the proof when today deleted the numbers of Spain and Italy in the article mentioned before just because he wanted, deleting the official numbers from the official source. ] --TechnicianGB (talk) 16:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

• Page protected for a period of one week. Clearly, there's edit warring. But to violate 3RR there needs to be four reverts in 24 hours. El_C 16:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

User:DrKay and User:Dawnseeker2000 reported by User:128.40.9.164 (Result: 24 hours—Boomerang)

Page: Harry Glicken (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: DrKay (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Dawnseeker2000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: ,

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

I noticed a rather controversial statement in the article above, stating that the subject of the article was eccentric, disorganised, and had "behavioral oddities". I could not verify this information because it did not have an inline citation, so I added tags to indicate that a citation was needed. My expectation was that someone who knew where the material had come from would simply add a citation tag to the end of the appropriate sentences. I am pretty disgusted by what in fact happened, which was that two people have edit warred to simply remove the tags. It defies explanation, and I believe these two users most likely simply feel a sense of ownership of the article and resent my attempt to improve it. I do not think anyone has violated the 3RR but their disruptive behaviour really needs to be stopped. 128.40.9.164 (talk) 20:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. IP, that is, Boomerang-blocked. The other two users did not breach 3RR, though they are cautioned for edit warring. Maybe just give the ip the source they're asking for in order to resolve this once and for all. El_C 20:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

• We did: . This same IP has been warned for edit-warring twice in the last three months. Note to IP: the diffs of 3RR warnings provided above do not meet minimum standards. The warnings should come before the 3RR report not at the same time. Reports should only be filed after a warning has been given and ignored. DrKay (talk) 20:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

• I stand corrected. I would suggest maybe quote the relevant passage from those pages to the IP. And maybe add a ref to that spot with those specific page nos. El_C 21:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Cupcake92166 reported by User:KATMAKROFAN (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page

PAW Patrol (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Cupcake92166 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 00:31, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 769177259 by KATMAKROFAN (talk)"
2. 00:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 769176870 by Amir Hamzah 2008 (talk)"
3. 00:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Cupcake92166 moved page PAW Patrol to Template:PAW Patrol over redirect"
4. 00:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Cupcake92166 moved page PAW Patrol to Template:PAW Patrol over redirect"
5. Consecutive edits made from 00:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC) to 00:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
   1. 00:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Cupcake92166 moved page PAW Patrol to Template:PAW Patrol"
   2. 00:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 769172092 by EricEnfermero (talk)"
6. Consecutive edits made from 21:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC) to 21:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
   1. 21:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC) ""
   2. 21:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 00:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Only warning: Page moves against naming conventions or consensus. (TW)"
2. 00:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "/* March 2017 */"
3. 00:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Template talk:PAW Patrol. (TW)"
4. 00:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Template:PAW Patrol. (TW)"
5. 00:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Final warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material. (TW)"
6. 00:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "/* March 2017 */"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Move warring and edit warring over unsourced content. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

I've blocked 24 hours, which is the standard first offense block... I'm going to leave it to someone else to decide if they want to close this, or discuss whether a longer block is justified, as this was pretty bad, and even resulted in move warring. I have no objection if another admin wants to go with a longer duration. Monty₈₄₅ 00:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Monty845, I was looking at this too and reinforced your block with a clear warning about the length of the next block. NeilN 00:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

User:2601:190:4200:df2e::f162 reported by User:Jytdog (Result: Page protected)

Page: Gender differences in suicide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2601:190:4200:df2e::f162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: diff

Diffs of the user's reverts:

• diff; their initial edit at 22:16, 1 March 2017‎ , which was reverted

1. diff at 13:29, 4 March 2017‎
2. diff 00:26, 7 March 2017 same change and more extensive removal on same issue
3. diff 14:09, 7 March 2017
4. diff 23:07, 7 March 2017

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: diff

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Piles of sources in the article and re-presented and summarized at Talk. IP editor is making OR arguments about why content and refs are wrong, and failing to provide sources to support their changes, and edit warring all the while. Jytdog (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Page protected for a period of one week. Clearly, some edit warring, but no 3RR violation. Use talk page to remind user that verifiability depends on citing reliable sources. El_C 03:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Jimthing reported by User:NinjaRobotPirate (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page

IMDb (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Jimthing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 04:08, 8 March 2017 (UTC) ""
2. 03:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC) ""
3. 00:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 769180448 by NinjaRobotPirate (talk) See talk."
4. 00:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 04:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on IMDb. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Talk:IMDb#TMDB mentions

Comments:

Jimthing has been edit warring against consensus to include poorly-sourced material. Three editors have attempted to remove it and explained why on the talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but each editor there has given differing reasons for removing ALL the data I added; under a I don't like it syndrome, rather than proper WP policy, each using differing excuses for removal. Even if they disagree with parts, then they should edit the parts they feel are not sourced or break WP policy, not simply remove ALL the text I added for the parts with valid sources, that make it perfectly acceptable under WP rules. Thanks you. Jimthing (talk) 04:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours NeilN 04:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

User:129.21.159.59 reported by User:CityOfSilver (Result: Page protected—TBD)

Page: Computer Science House (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 129.21.159.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: This user is a clear vandal who, as soon as they learn about a policy, sets about violating it while accusing others of violating it. This IP geolocates to the Rochester Institute of Technology, meaning this user cannot make substantial edits to that article or anything in its orbit because of WP:COI. They've responded to my explanation of this policy by repeatedly inserting trash sourced to Reddit at Computer Science House while summarizing their reverts with a lie that I have a conflict of interest. They are aware from last time that editing like this will earn them a block.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: See this edit summary, which came 14 minutes after they were blocked for edit warring, and gauge the potential of having a positive interaction with this person.

Comments:

Despite over a dozen edit summaries by User talk:129.21.159.59 that contained WP:NPA violations on their own talk page when they were blocked, admin User:El C chose not to remove talk page access or extend the block. (Per the very first bullet point on WP:EW#What edit warring is, El C incorrectly characterized my reverts of vandal edits as edit warring.) Hours after the minuscule block expired, the user resumed edit warring with a hopelessly unacceptable edit (that, since the summary included a lying attack on me, means it was vandalism) at Computer Science House. The block must be at least a week and it cannot allow talk page access during that time. If you disagree, please leave this report to a different admin. CityOfSilver 16:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

• Comment: You two, again! Do I need to block both of you? Or would you rather I set up an interaction ban? (It's the latter, right?) That said, IP, I have questions: 1. Have you read BLPCRIME and do you think it applies in this case? And 2. What COI are you referring to? El_C 18:45, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

• Comment: And CityOfSilver, the only reason you weren't blocked before was because I try to err on the side of leniency—but when I tell you to leave a blocked user's talk page, you do it. If anything, you took advantage of my then-spotty connection. Many admins would block you after-the-fact for that. Anyway, you don't get a different admin, you already have me. I'm the one investigating and the one familiar with the case of you two. I caution you, though, that a 2nd opinion might hit you like a boomerang. El_C 19:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
• Comment: Regarding the personal attacks, I have already given a warning to both of you, for both the "angry virgin" and "snowflake" (an insult I'm not familiar with) namecalling. Moving on, you should both take that warning as one-and-only warning regarding NPA violations. But there's not gonna be retroactive blocks issued. El_C 19:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
• CityOfSilver, you are so lucky I didn't see this a couple of days ago. You would have been blocked for a couple of days. 14 reverts in just under 2 hours is completely unacceptable. That isn't counting the 4 reverts on the article. You need to back away. - GB fan 19:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Unknownassassin reported by User:Galatz (Result: No violation—Page protected 24 hours)

Page: Prison Break: Sequel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Unknownassassin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Comments:
I attempted to bring this discussion to the WP:RFP page first, to lock the page down however the user has chose to go way beyond what that page is for, and potentially beyond here as well. He appears to be using an IP address as a WP:SOCK to do additional reverts and changes, as you can tell by comparing their contributions and . In addition he has tried moving the page in addition to his other random moves through copy and pasting and after it was undone the IP user redid it . Therefore I would say on top of edit warring there are plenty of other violations as well. - Galatz 18:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

• No violation. I'm not sure that fourth diff is a revert, it it seems like just an edit. So, unless you can prove to me that it is a revert, I'm ruling this as no breach of 3RR. But Unknownassassin is still admonished, and is cautioned, about edit warring. I have also protected the page for a week. El_C 18:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

@El C: Thanks. He moved the page originally here which was moved back, he then moved it again here and it was moved back, and then again moved it here. Meaning 2RR relating to the move, and then the first 2 make 4. If we look into the IP sock account he also had making 5.

Also since you locked it from moving can you also move back to the original page Prison Break (season 5) so a proper move request can be made and addressed? - Galatz 18:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

@El C:Also it appears only Admins can edit the page now, did you mean to do that? - Galatz 19:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. Page unprotected. El_C 19:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

@El C: Thanks so much for your help! Sorry to be a pain but can you move the page back to the original page Prison Break (season 5), due to the way he went about moving everything only an admin can move it now. - Galatz 19:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring
• Misplaced Pages:Edit warring