| Revision as of 22:44, 27 April 2005 editJ. 'mach' wust (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,149 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 14:58, 22 September 2006 edit undoCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,578 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I'd suggest to change this category to "Middle-earth linguistics". By now, ] and ] are included here, even though they are clearly not languages, but scripts. I think they'd better fit into a category "Middle-earth linguistics". ] 22:44, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) | I'd suggest to change this category to "Middle-earth linguistics". By now, ] and ] are included here, even though they are clearly not languages, but scripts. I think they'd better fit into a category "Middle-earth linguistics". ] 22:44, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Some reorganisation has addressed some of the points you raised. Hopefully all is OK now. ] 14:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:58, 22 September 2006
I'd suggest to change this category to "Middle-earth linguistics". By now, tengwar and cirth are included here, even though they are clearly not languages, but scripts. I think they'd better fit into a category "Middle-earth linguistics". J. 'mach' wust 22:44, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Some reorganisation has addressed some of the points you raised. Hopefully all is OK now. Carcharoth 14:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)