Misplaced Pages

Talk:G. T. Nanavati: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:49, 22 September 2006 editBakasuprman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,844 edits →Explanation for revert← Previous edit Revision as of 23:50, 22 September 2006 edit undoBakasuprman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,844 edits →countercurrentsNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
Disqualified under ]. Plese explain how articles like "Bush Wants Disqualified under ]. Plese explain how articles like "Bush Wants
A Bloodbath In Baghdad", "Reflections On Our Inner Bush: Corporate Monkeys In Our National House Of Mirrors ", and "Rise Up Against the Empire", indicate any sort of ''accurate'' and ''objective'' newsgiving. None. That's where "Pointy-headed academic argument" ends up in: Garbage dumps like countercurrents.] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 23:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC) A Bloodbath In Baghdad", "Reflections On Our Inner Bush: Corporate Monkeys In Our National House Of Mirrors ", and "Rise Up Against the Empire", indicate any sort of ''accurate'' and ''objective'' newsgiving. None. That's where "Pointy-headed academic argument" ends up in: Garbage dumps like countercurrents.] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 23:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

:Even the organiser is more quotable than countercurrents.] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 23:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:50, 22 September 2006

WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Links

Explanation for revert

I am reverting baka's removal of my expansion of a section which he carried out with the edit summary "rm OR". Its not OR. Its directly from the rediff.com link you provided. For the 100th time overall and the second time today, Baka, at least try to read the links that you provide, if you dont want to appear a little inept. Hornplease 05:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

They are talking aboput the Sikh riots in that train of thought. Congrats on misrepresenting the links.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

countercurrents

Disqualified under WP:RS. Plese explain how articles like "Bush Wants A Bloodbath In Baghdad", "Reflections On Our Inner Bush: Corporate Monkeys In Our National House Of Mirrors ", and "Rise Up Against the Empire", indicate any sort of accurate and objective newsgiving. None. That's where "Pointy-headed academic argument" ends up in: Garbage dumps like countercurrents.Bakaman Bakatalk 23:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Even the organiser is more quotable than countercurrents.Bakaman Bakatalk 23:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Categories: