Misplaced Pages

Talk:2006 Ryder Cup: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:43, 23 September 2006 editJs farrar (talk | contribs)485 edits Updating← Previous edit Revision as of 10:01, 24 September 2006 edit undoBucs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers11,140 edits UpdatingNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:


:I don't think it does any harm, provided that uncompleted matches are marked as such; if someone wants to sit at their computer updating Misplaced Pages whilst watching the golf, let them... ] 10:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC) :I don't think it does any harm, provided that uncompleted matches are marked as such; if someone wants to sit at their computer updating Misplaced Pages whilst watching the golf, let them... ] 10:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree it shouldn't be minute by minute thing. But play lasts about 4 or 5 hours in which time a lot people are going view this article so there needs to by some sort of latest score update.] 10:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:01, 24 September 2006

Updating

There's not a lot of point updating the scores whilst in play. Misplaced Pages isn't an up-to-the minute sports service. Surely an update once per day (at most) is enough? MikesPlant 16:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't think it does any harm, provided that uncompleted matches are marked as such; if someone wants to sit at their computer updating Misplaced Pages whilst watching the golf, let them... Js farrar 10:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree it shouldn't be minute by minute thing. But play lasts about 4 or 5 hours in which time a lot people are going view this article so there needs to by some sort of latest score update.Buc 10:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)