Revision as of 14:06, 22 September 2006 editVadakkan (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers2,877 edits non-binding arbitration is mostly US-specific← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:52, 25 September 2006 edit undo59.93.69.187 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | \heyArbitration is today most commonly used for the resolution of ] disputes, particularly in the context of ]. It is also used in some countries to resolve other types of disputes, such as ] disputes, ] disputes or ] disputes, and for the resolution of certain disputes between ]s and between investors and states. | ||
'''Arbitration''' is a ] technique for the resolution of ]s outside the ]s, wherein the parties to a dispute refer it to one or more persons (the "]s" or "arbitral tribunal"), by whose decision (the "]") they agree to be bound. ], the term is also used to refer to ], a process in which the final award does not bind the parties. | |||
⚫ | |||
Revision as of 08:52, 25 September 2006
\heyArbitration is today most commonly used for the resolution of commercial disputes, particularly in the context of international commercial transactions. It is also used in some countries to resolve other types of disputes, such as labour disputes, consumer disputes or family disputes, and for the resolution of certain disputes between states and between investors and states.
See also
This law-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |