Misplaced Pages

User talk:ESkog: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:45, 1 May 2017 editNick Moyes (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators64,810 edits December's Fall: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 00:46, 2 May 2017 edit undoSwisterTwister (talk | contribs)187,094 edits CNext edit →
Line 27: Line 27:


Hi - I noticed the blanking of the recently created page, ], which you reverted a few moments before I was about to. However, I then spotted that the editor who blanked it was also the article's creator, and who had just had the page turned down under ] by {{ping|SwisterTwister}}. With a couple of referenced added prior to its blanking, the band still doesn't seem to meet notability criteria as far as I can see. So I was wondering whether this was a cynical attempt by the page creator to ensure its retention, or alternatively a genuine attempt to blank and remove the page. I'm not sure how to proceed with this, so thought I'd flag it for more experienced editors to consider. Regards. ] (]) 19:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC) Hi - I noticed the blanking of the recently created page, ], which you reverted a few moments before I was about to. However, I then spotted that the editor who blanked it was also the article's creator, and who had just had the page turned down under ] by {{ping|SwisterTwister}}. With a couple of referenced added prior to its blanking, the band still doesn't seem to meet notability criteria as far as I can see. So I was wondering whether this was a cynical attempt by the page creator to ensure its retention, or alternatively a genuine attempt to blank and remove the page. I'm not sure how to proceed with this, so thought I'd flag it for more experienced editors to consider. Regards. ] (]) 19:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
*As the current page shows, it's been speedy deletion nominated and it fits the criteria. ] ] 00:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:46, 2 May 2017


Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
Start a new talk topic.


Index of Talk Page archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F May 19-December 22, 2010 - December 23, 2010 - November 10, 2011 - December 8, 2011 - October 8, 2012 - October 18, 2012 - May 27, 2013 - May 30, 2013 - March 26, 2014 - January 29, 2015 - March 15, 2017

Undeleting revisions of Misplaced Pages is not

Misplaced Pages is not (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Hello. The redirect page was re-created last year. May you undelete the revisions then, which were deleted per RfD? --George Ho (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Great job keeping Misplaced Pages clean from vandalism. XboxGamer22408 17:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

December's Fall

Hi - I noticed the blanking of the recently created page, December's Fall, which you reverted a few moments before I was about to. However, I then spotted that the editor who blanked it was also the article's creator, and who had just had the page turned down under WP:AFC by @SwisterTwister:. With a couple of referenced added prior to its blanking, the band still doesn't seem to meet notability criteria as far as I can see. So I was wondering whether this was a cynical attempt by the page creator to ensure its retention, or alternatively a genuine attempt to blank and remove the page. I'm not sure how to proceed with this, so thought I'd flag it for more experienced editors to consider. Regards. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)