| Revision as of 05:11, 16 September 2006 editJohnww2 (talk | contribs)11 edits wearing stigmata← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:36, 26 September 2006 edit undoKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits please helpNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Oh well, collectivism is only worth so much before the flaws emerge. | Oh well, collectivism is only worth so much before the flaws emerge. | ||
| == Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now == | |||
| Sorry to bother you, but as an ] things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion ]. ] 02:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:36, 26 September 2006
Possible single purpose account
Hi: I saw this on an "article for deletion" page (here):
- Possible single purpose account: Johnww2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
I don't know about any "single purpose" policy myself. You might want to investigate that. Kaimiddleton 21:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
wearing stigmata
thanks. I already got branded with the same tag for posting against deleting PESWiki entry. I've lost some faith in wikipedia when I see the slack manner in which the elitists on here brand people with that tag to diminish their voice. It seems so against the very core principle of what Misplaced Pages is about.
Oh well, collectivism is only worth so much before the flaws emerge.
Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Category: