Revision as of 07:06, 24 September 2006 editOrphanBot (talk | contribs)654,820 edits Problem with fairuse image upload← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:47, 26 September 2006 edit undoKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits please helpNext edit → | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 07:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC) | This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 07:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now == | |||
Sorry to bother you, but as an ] things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion ]. ] 02:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:47, 26 September 2006
I have moved all Image related posts to User_talk:Klingoncowboy4/images
wikiversity vote
If you cast a wikiversity vote, please make a link at your Wikimedia meta-wiki user page linking back to your wikipedia user page. If you do not do so, your vote will not count. --JWSchmidt 15:46, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Babel
As per a comment left by you on My User Talk Page I added tlh-1 in a Babel box. In order to add more languages, you need to do the following..
{{babel-1|tlh-1}} {{babel-2|tlh-1|en}} {{babel-3|tlh-1|en|fr-2}}
Those are three seperate examples of different boxes. I suggest referring to WP:BBL
I hope I was of some help. :-)
Deskana 20:45, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Edit summary
Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. JoaoRicardo 01:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Brogo on AfD
Hi, I've nominated your Brogo article for deletion at Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Brogo. I don't belive it is notable enough for an encyclopedia article. -- Dragonfiend 23:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/LearnNet
As the creator of LearnNet, you wish to participate in this discussion of whether the article should be kept, deleted, or merged. --Rob 06:10, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Raising Chickens wikibook
Hi,
Over on wikibook Raising_Chickens you mention feeding potato peeland mouldy buns. Potato peel is hard for them to digest. Mouldy food can poison them. See appropriate websites: http://www.google.com/search?q=%2Bchickens+%22potato+peel%22 and books such as 'Storey's Guide to Raising Chickens' by Gail Damerow.
Njál 17:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Save Jeeves
Good to see that some people other than me want to save Jeeves! - Michael Goonan(talk) 00:37, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Borderline (band)
This band is rising in the Vancouver music scene. Also sine the lead vocalist is also a popular Canadian actress it is of significance. True enough this article should be a stub until more information can be added.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Klingoncowboy4 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 22 August 2006
- Don't forget, you need to add {{hangon}} to this article pretty quick if you intend to keep working on it to bring it up to standards. --Satori Son 06:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
RfA listing
Hi, I've removing your self-nom RfA from Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship as you haven't answered the questions yet, and your confusing signature suggests it's not a self-nom. Please state it's a self-nom before relisting. Thanks. Andeh 02:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
User:PseudoSudo appears to have relisted it for you. Andeh 02:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Nope, I've removed the entry again per Andeh's post above. kc4: as he suggests, clarify that you are nominating yourself, answer the questions, and then relist on the main page. ~ PseudoSudo 03:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've given you weak support, but I agree with other editors, you seriously should withdraw your nomination and try again later. Mostly Rainy 11:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Iain, I have closed your RfA as it was getting very one-sided and nothing new was being added by those opposing you. As consensus had been decided upon, there was no point in the poll snowballing any further. I hope you are not too disappointed by this outcome and continue contributing to Misplaced Pages, if you follow the advice given to you by other editors I am sure you will become a valuable admin in the future. If you have any questions please feel free to ask. Yours, Rje 12:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology
Since you are interested in flags and emblems I would like to inform you that the WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology has just been created. Why not take a look? I hope you can join. Inge 19:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Wabamun lake alberta oil spill.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wabamun lake alberta oil spill.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 04:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi
Welcome to the Opera Project: thanks for joining. Thank also for your work on opera. Size limits aren't at all strict on WP, so I don't think there is need for panic about the article's size. I've written about 9 new paragraphs since July, and plan to get the article up to WP:GA standard. IMO, the plan is to let the article grow for a bit, get it balanced, and then cut it down to size. Thanks for all the help thus far. My idea from now was to add a "Criticism" section, and a "Current worldwide operatic scene" (or something like that: in the current incarnation one would rather think opera had died out in the 60s). I don't suppose that you could help out with either (or both) of these two? Give me a shout. Best, Moreschi 15:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Irvis.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Irvis.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Category: