| Revision as of 16:55, 2 August 2006 editGoDot (talk | contribs)564 edits →Jolly Roger: so close to consenus, request your response← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:49, 26 September 2006 edit undoKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits please helpNext edit → | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
| We are so very close to consenus. Toward that end, <u>have you any concerns</u> I might address? Please let me know. Would you change your vote to delete--or at least to neutral? Thank you for your response. --] 16:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | We are so very close to consenus. Toward that end, <u>have you any concerns</u> I might address? Please let me know. Would you change your vote to delete--or at least to neutral? Thank you for your response. --] 16:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now == | |||
| Sorry to bother you, but as an ] things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion ]. ] 02:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:49, 26 September 2006
|
Organic Expansion
I see you're new. Welcome. Let me know if there's any help you need, admin or otherwise. I'll be on the lookout for your "Organic Expansion" keep votes at my AfD's - lol! - CrazyRussian talk/email 03:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Reliability of Google
I noticed an argument you were making on AfD recently about the reliability or lack thereof of Google hits. If you want to explain it further, I'd be very interested in hearing it. After all, anything which can make Misplaced Pages a better place is obviously a good thing, is it not? BigHaz 05:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Orchard Hill Church
Just be careful with the rhetoric when responding to AfD nominations. Saying that someone doesn't "take deletion...seriously" is flying close to the wind where WP:NPA is concerned. BigHaz 04:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Fight_Dem_Back
Hi, I was hoping you could further explain your vote on this AfD nom. Drett 14:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Jolly Roger
Dear sir
Re. Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jolly Roger Restaurant, I am seeking consensus. Toward meeting your interests, the topic already exists in improved and in complete form, per Misplaced Pages standards, in context, at Lake City, Seattle, Washington#Storied past. The piece was chopped out by a newbie. The damage was soon repaired, and I've been trying to clean up this uprooted duplicate leftover. For Misplaced Pages quality, I would prefer disposing of this odd snippet, rather than leaving a scrap lying about. I am the original researcher and author of the topic in the article, post . The Jolly Roger story is an integral part of the character of Lake City, but it is otherwise not particularly encyclopedic.
So toward consenus, would you change your vote? Thank you for your consideration. --GoDot 11:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC), (ed.) --19:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Dear sir
I am seeking consensus. Toward meeting your interests, have you any further concerns I might address? Please let me know. Otherwise, we are very close to consenus: Would you change your vote to delete? Thank you for your consideration. --GoDot 19:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
We are so very close to consenus. Toward that end, have you any concerns I might address? Please let me know. Would you change your vote to delete--or at least to neutral? Thank you for your response. --GoDot 16:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Category: