| Revision as of 08:07, 7 April 2006 editMe lkjhgfdsa (talk | contribs)164 editsm →Article listed for deletion← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:52, 26 September 2006 edit undoKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits please helpNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Welcome!''' | '''Welcome!''' | ||
| Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
| No problem ] 08:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | No problem ] 08:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now == | |||
| Sorry to bother you, but as an ] things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion ]. ] 02:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:52, 26 September 2006
Welcome!
Hello, Me lkjhgfdsa, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! The Neokid talk 11:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Misplaced Pages there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
– Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Article listed for deletion
Hi Me lkjhgfdsa,
I noticed from the Inclusionist category page that you're an inclusionist, too, so I was wondering if you would be able to do me a huge favor and possibly place a vote here: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Embarazada. I added a ton to it, citing my sources. If you could, I would be greatly in your debt.
Best wishes,
Primetime 21:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, my friend!--Primetime 23:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
No problem Me lkjhgfdsa 08:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Category: