| Revision as of 09:33, 4 September 2006 editTheblackbay (talk | contribs)926 edits Hello NightSky theBlackbay here← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:55, 26 September 2006 edit undoKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits please helpNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| -] 09:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | -] 09:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now == | |||
| Sorry to bother you, but as an ] things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion ]. ] 02:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:55, 26 September 2006
Welcome to NightSky's Talk Page!
Hello NightSky theBlackbay here
Help From fellow Wikipedians against censorship!
Thank you for your time I was wondering if i could ask your opinion?? :)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin here is the Article on G. Edward Griffin that I have just reconstructed and am still in the process of doing, But it's been put up for deletion?.
I was wondering if you could pitch in a comment in any direction you feel but I believe this man is very notable having Authored such books as The Creature from Jekyll Island a history of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, but also many many more films as well, also being a member of many organisations.
Me being an inclusionist of sorts I would rather see changes made rather than a wholesale deletion, what do you think?
The man is very notable he has been doing this sort of work since the 60’s when he created the “The Capitalist Conspiracy” one of the first and most documented histories of Political Corruption in film that I know of.
Thank you for all your help, I’m just starting out in Misplaced Pages I have created the Benjamin H. Freedman, article and reconstructed the The Money Masters article and some others but I need help here! Any help of mine you may need or want in any regard in the future just ask :)
Also any contribution you would like to make to improve the article please consider!
-Theblackbay 09:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Category: