| Revision as of 15:33, 25 September 2006 editDineshkannambadi (talk | contribs)Rollbackers29,841 edits Insecurity~~~~← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:39, 26 September 2006 edit undoMahawiki (talk | contribs)1,389 edits →Insecurity[] 15:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Next edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| Dinesh Kannambadi | Dinesh Kannambadi | ||
| This is really shameful and embarrassing!U suppose to be well-educated with ur prowess in English still u r acting as Kannadi extremist well equiped with fanatic materials to wage a 'jehad' against other states.Dear Dinesh,open ur mind,get rid of prejudices and READ the article very carefully.Ask ur conscience havent u being partial?Havent u glorified Kannada languages against Marathi? | |||
| I am gonna buy some encyplopedia cds to shut every fanatics mouth here!In fact I end this discussion here since there's no need for redirection of Yadavas to Seuna.So continue ur Kannadi fanaticsm here and mind u,dont even think of degrading Maharashtra's histroy from now onwards... | |||
| Jai Maharashtra | |||
| ] 08:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| BTW I take ur comments that Maharashtra history is tied to K'taka very lightly as one who says Vihayanagara, Rashtrakutas, Chalukyas, Mughals(?) are Kannadis, all Maharashtrians are actually Kannadis, Shivaji Maharaj is a Kannadi, Kannadi is the old and Marathi has evolved from Kannada and Konkani,Kannadi kavi Pipes and Pump's have enriched Kannada to make it a claasical language blah blah blah!!!!U know what ur blabbering isnt amusing anymore,it counts to cultural terrorism...accept Islam or else...Oh yeah in ur case say Kannadi is best else...! | |||
| ] 08:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:39, 26 September 2006
Kannadi marketing
This article is another case of Kannadi marketing.Plz see the article for how Kannada is being glorified against Marathi and Sanskrit.I will be shortly getting reference to end up this Kannadisation for I am pretty sure about the Yadavas and Marathi being official language during their reign.Merging Yadavs with Seuns is infact unwarrented.
If I rememeber this article is about 2-3rd in row including Rashtrakuta Vijayanagara_empire.This is very disguisting.Few users are deliberately moulding history to satisfy their lingual fanaticsm.They are well-equiped with nonsense and crappy sources like that of Kannadi fanatic Mr.Kamath.Nonetheless,I am sure I shall be getting a good citation to wipe out this utter nonsense which endorses karnataka. Mahawiki 08:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyesDineshkannambadi 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. If you try to remove any material without arbitration, you will find youself in a soup and quit cribbing about Vijayanagar empire, you cant do anything there. I am fully sourced from 4 different sources of research.
Dinesh KAnnambadi
Dear Dinesh, Keep these article with u.And stop swearing by that foolish books written by illiterate and ignorant Kannadi writers.I am starting to develop Yadava article soon,so continue with ur lies here.Yadav article should not be redirected here.
And get this in ur head-if u dont stop ur moronic Kannadi sermons I am myself gonna go to arbiteration.And u will see that.Ok Rashtrakutas and Vijayanagara empire was Kannadi but YADAVS being Kannadi????Are u for real?And yes call ur friend Sarvagnya too..by this u have only expressed ur 'insecurity' .No more moulding of history please.And yeah trash that kamats books.Dont think that u can hide the glorious past of Maharashtrians. Mahawiki 14:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Maharashtra history is intimately tied to Karnataka History129.42.208.182 15:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The day you guys realise this, much of the disputes will go away. Unfortunately as I have stated earlier, politicials and false history propaganda machinery has I believe hidden much of real history from Indians. I am not saying this with malice against any particular state.
Regarding the Yadavas or Seunas, remember that they were feudatories first of the Rashtrakuta (late period of Rashtrakuta) and all the way thru the Kalyani Chalukya rule before declaring independence. I have quoted the names of the Kannada scholars in the Suena court, their works etc. I have also given balanced info about the arrival of Marathi literature only because thats what the source says. I have done this without any prejudice or personal gains. Its upto you to see this with an open mind. Feel free to bring other sources. In fact I can quote you a source other then Kamath (Since you hate him). Please take time to read history first and discuss and Tag. Creating alternate pages for the same topic based on challenge and ego is not acceptable to either history or probably wikipedia.
Dinesh Kannambadi
InsecurityDineshkannambadi 15:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Forgot to log in earlier. Lets not forget you received a similar message from your friend Arya also when he came across the Seuna page.
Dinesh Kannambadi
This is really shameful and embarrassing!U suppose to be well-educated with ur prowess in English still u r acting as Kannadi extremist well equiped with fanatic materials to wage a 'jehad' against other states.Dear Dinesh,open ur mind,get rid of prejudices and READ the article very carefully.Ask ur conscience havent u being partial?Havent u glorified Kannada languages against Marathi?
I am gonna buy some encyplopedia cds to shut every fanatics mouth here!In fact I end this discussion here since there's no need for redirection of Yadavas to Seuna.So continue ur Kannadi fanaticsm here and mind u,dont even think of degrading Maharashtra's histroy from now onwards... Jai Maharashtra
Mahawiki 08:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC) BTW I take ur comments that Maharashtra history is tied to K'taka very lightly as one who says Vihayanagara, Rashtrakutas, Chalukyas, Mughals(?) are Kannadis, all Maharashtrians are actually Kannadis, Shivaji Maharaj is a Kannadi, Kannadi is the old and Marathi has evolved from Kannada and Konkani,Kannadi kavi Pipes and Pump's have enriched Kannada to make it a claasical language blah blah blah!!!!U know what ur blabbering isnt amusing anymore,it counts to cultural terrorism...accept Islam or else...Oh yeah in ur case say Kannadi is best else...! Mahawiki 08:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)