Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:56, 17 May 2017 editDrivarum (talk \| contribs)94 edits →User:Drivarum reported by User:Capitals00 (Result: )← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:59, 17 May 2017 edit undoCapitals00 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,264 edits →User:Drivarum reported by User:Capitals00 (Result: ): 9th revert containing BLP violationNext edit →
Line 273:		Line 273:
	#		#
	#		#
			#
	#
			# (came after he responded to this report)

	Violating ] by claiming ], ] to be converts from Hinduism to Islam, while not providing single source of them stating that they converted from one religion to other.		Violating ] by claiming ], ] to be converts from Hinduism to Islam, while not providing single source of them stating that they converted from one religion to other.
Line 279:		Line 280:
	Clearly ], as per this ]: ] as well. Seems like an account created only for edit warring and disruption.		Clearly ], as per this ]: ] as well. Seems like an account created only for edit warring and disruption.

	Me and other editor have reverted his ] since its exempted from ] to remove BLP violation, but he still continues to violate BLP.		Me and other editor have reverted his ] since its exempted from ] to remove BLP violation, but he still continues to violate BLP.
	] (]) 06:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)		] (]) 06:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:59, 17 May 2017

v t e Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles and content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts

Update this page

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Click here to create a new report

Noticeboard archives
Administrators' (archives, search)
348	349	350	351	352	353	354	355	356	357
358	359	360	361	362	363	364	365	366	367
Incidents (archives, search)
1155	1156	1157	1158	1159	1160	1161	1162	1163	1164
1165	1166	1167	1168	1169	1170	1171	1172	1173	1174
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
471	472	473	474	475	476	477	478	479	480
481	482	483	484	485	486	487	488	489	490
Arbitration enforcement (archives)
327	328	329	330	331	332	333	334	335	336
337	338	339	340	341	342	343	344	345	346
Other links
Talk Sockpuppet investigations Backlog

User:27.6.240.201 reported by User:Kautilya3 (Result: Blocked )

Page: Meenakshi Jain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 27.6.240.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

15:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC) ""
13:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780487341 by Kautilya3 (talk)"
11:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780450091 by Tyler Durden (talk)"
04:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780448186 by Tyler Durden (talk)"
04:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780158975 by Tyler Durden (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

12:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Meenakshi Jain. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Persistent vandalism Kautilya3 (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. For some reason, administrators seem to be divided as whether blatant POV pushing is "vandalism", but I say it isn't so I treat it as a stock content dispute. Tyler Durden came close to being 3RR blocked for the same period, especially after this hypocrisy, but he hasn't done 4 reverts in 24 hours so I'll let him off with a warning to make sure you put a discussion on talk page so admins can at least see you have tried to get consensus. Ritchie333 17:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Report edit war (Result: semiprotection)

== ]

190.249.179.87

reported by User:95.123.53.78 (Result: ) ==

95.123.53.78

Page: Page-multi error: no page detected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/Sharon_Stone_filmography

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Stone_filmography&action=history

User being reported: User-multi error: no username detected (help).

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

You are the one doing unexplained and unnecesary changes with quite an ill-mannered response. You are also the one who must be reported. 190.249.179.87 (talk) 23:23, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Malformed report; page semiprotected. El_C 09:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

User:74.91.2.167 reported by User:Tenebrae (Result:Blocked 31 hours )

Previous version reverted to:

The anon IP has continually reverted to a clear violation of WP:FILM MOS that says a film article lists only the distributor of the country of origin, in this case the UK. This editor insists that despite the MOS that the U.S. of A. must be included:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

- of 21:58, 15 May 2017
- 23:33, 15 May 2017‎. Edit summary: (Seriously, it was released in the US on August 7, 2015, so it deserves a mention.)
23:38, 15 May 2017, Edit summary: (Oh yeah?! Well, you're not playing tough with me!)]
- 23:40, 15 May 2017. His edit summary after my saying, "You are on the verge of 3RR": (NO I'M NOT!)]
- 00:02, 16 May 2017, following a second editor reverting his edit.
- 00:07, 16 May 2017‎. Edit summary: (I DON'T CARE!)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Blocked 31 hours. Bencherlite 00:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- For the record, this is User:Nate Speed. I already range blocked this ISP (looks like a webhost service), but my range block apparently wasn't wide enough. I've expanded it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

User:73.61.13.95 reported by User:Kude90 (Result: Semiprotection)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:It's a little odd because it is two different IPs from Massachusetts. They have done nothing ever on Misplaced Pages except remove this section from the article stating it doesn't belong even though the source says it's DC making an animated Watchmen movie. I tried to get them to use the talk section but they just keep saying it doesn't belong. I don't know if this technically isn't a violation because it's three separate (but similar) IP's, but if it's not I would love for some help with how to resolve this. Thanks in advance.

Page protected. Semiprotection. El_C 09:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

User:AHM22 reported by User:JJMC89 (Result: 60 hours)

Page: Cotabato City (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: AHM22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

07:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780626446 by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk) Informations are factual and none promotional"
07:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780623729 by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk) JThis informations ARE BASIC!! AND FACTUAL INFORMATION IN THE CITY! IT DOES NOT PROMOTING THE CITY!!"
03:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780602294 by JJMC89 (talk) JJMC IS NOT VEIRFYING THE CITATIONS ATTACHED!"
03:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780602045 by JJMC89 (talk)"
03:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780601931 by JJMC89 (talk)"
03:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780295457 by JJMC89 (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

03:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Cotabato City.) (TW"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

03:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "/* NOTDIRECTORY / PROMO */ new section"

Comments:

*Level Four* grade WP:OWNership problem here undoubtedly. I've removed most of the cruft again; hopefully that's an end to it. Thanks JJMC89 for lodging this. — O Fortuna 07:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Update: I've added a new link. This is ridiculous, reverting instead of posting here. — O Fortuna 07:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

And I've just noticed that, far from using the talk page to discuss the issue, AHM22 actually removed the discussion when it first started! — O Fortuna 07:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 60 hours. El_C 09:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

User:83.151.234.210 reported by User:Bbb23 (Result: Blocked)

Page: Joan Ryan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 83.151.234.210 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

15:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780677947 by Bbb23 (talk) see talk"
14:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780670026 by Bbb23 (talk) concise, relevant and well sourced."
Consecutive edits made from 11:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC) to 11:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
1. 11:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780643451 by Jim1138 (talk) I will reference her overlooking a golf course later."
2. 11:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "removing trivia"
10:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780635084 by Jim1138 (talk)"
09:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780631722 by Jim1138 (talk)Factual, relevant and sourced. It is still said she lives in her constituency, among her voters which is false."
08:35, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 780624038 by Philip Cross (talk) factual, relevant and sourced"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

15:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Joan Ryan. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

The material being added is not noteworthy and WP:COATRACKy. The IP has been warned multiple times (other things besides edit-warring). Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

The information being added is not sourced, likely contentious, and is probably in violation of wp:BLP Jim1138 (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked – 48 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 19:22, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Reynolds89 reported by User:Herostratus (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

Page: Charles Feltman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Reynolds89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), also his sockpuppet User:JohnsonWales (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

(actually User:JohnsonWales, surely a sock
User:JohnsonWales again
(back to Reynolds89)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: see Talk:Charles Feltman#Who invented the hot dog. editor has not engaged.

Comments:

Editor (and also User:JohnsonWales, who certainly quacks like his sock -- simultaneous identical attacks on the same page, with similar edit summaries) have zero constructive edits, only edit-warring on the Charles Feltman page. Herostratus (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 48 hours Watching JohnsonWales NeilN 20:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Danke NeilN. Herostratus (talk) 21:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

User:A35821361 reported by User:Cuñado (Result: )

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Ongoing here: , most recent here:

Comments:

The five diffs linked as reverts are similar to past edit warring, but those in particular break the 3RR and also are the first to more flagrantly antagonize the other editors by including an obviously POV "in the wake of an apocalyptic insurrection". Cuñado ☼ - Talk 06:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

There may have also been a previous violation by the same user when an anonymous account reverted to A35821361's version. Original edit by A35821361 , 1st revert by anon , 2nd revert by anon . Cuñado ☼ - Talk 06:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Drivarum reported by User:Capitals00 (Result: )

Previous version reverted to: 4 May

Diffs of the user's reverts:

14 May 2017
19:26, 16 May 2017
04:16, 17 May 2017
05:50, 17 May 2017
06:09, 17 May 2017
06:32, 17 May 2017
06:38, 17 May 2017
06:46, 17 May 2017‎
06:56 17 May 2017 (came after he responded to this report)

Violating WP:BLP by claiming A. R. Rahman, Hema Malini to be converts from Hinduism to Islam, while not providing single source of them stating that they converted from one religion to other.

Clearly not a new user, as per this WP:SPI: Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Anatha Gulati as well. Seems like an account created only for edit warring and disruption.

Me and other editor have reverted his WP:BLPVIO since its exempted from WP:3RRNO to remove BLP violation, but he still continues to violate BLP. Capitals00 (talk) 06:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
User:Capitals00 is actually edit warring and keep reverting well referenced texts without participating on the article's talk page despite repeated request from my edit summary. I even responded to resolve on my talk page

His reverts are:

and it should be noted that he has previously socked. The case is here: with 3 blocked socks.

I guess he is using another sock whose diffs are:

to avoid 3RR until he found out that "WP:BLPCAT exempts from WP:3RR" and keep writing that when reverting my edits. Drivarum (talk) 06:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Categories: