| Revision as of 00:53, 17 May 2017 editValoem (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,269 editsm Reverted edits by RexxS (talk) to last version by Valoem← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:37, 17 May 2017 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,259 edits WarningNext edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | ||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC) | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ==Warning== | |||
| Hi. I noticed you and RexxS at loggerheads at ], and on each other's pages. I won't make the call as to who is right or wrong, since RexxS is a friend of mine who often helps me with technical issues. But I note , where you strike out RexxS's support for a merge (!) with the edit summary "removed comment from RexxS editor has personal reason for voting deletion". Since you're an experienced editor, you should really know better than to tamper with another person's comment. Also don't attack them like that in the edit summary. What are you saying, anyway? "Personal reason"? As in, you think RexxS has a personal animosity against the company..? It sounds ridiculous on the face of it. You may well be topic banned from the Electronic cigarette topic area (see the discretionary sanctions alert above) if you continue to act like that. (Also, please don't post on a user's page after they have asked you not to.) ] | ] 10:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC). | |||
Revision as of 10:37, 17 May 2017
 Archives |
|---|
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Luger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Juul (electronic cigarette) merge
The content was merged without the unsourced text and unreliable sources. Thanks QuackGuru (talk) 03:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I sorry I do not agree with this merge there are plenty of reliable sources. Valoem 04:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- You restored unreliable sources and unsourced content. Please read the section below. QuackGuru (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Where? Also thanks for letting me know something I wrote was bold merge., I'll replace again source if needed, but I'm not see anything issues. Valoem 04:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- You didn't notice any problem with this edit? QuackGuru (talk) 04:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- It appears advert Emilynorelll (talk · contribs) vandalized the article I restored the original version I wrote. Valoem 05:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I tagged the spam you accidently restored. QuackGuru (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Okay we can start a formal merge process. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I tagged the spam you accidently restored. QuackGuru (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- It appears advert Emilynorelll (talk · contribs) vandalized the article I restored the original version I wrote. Valoem 05:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- You didn't notice any problem with this edit? QuackGuru (talk) 04:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Where? Also thanks for letting me know something I wrote was bold merge., I'll replace again source if needed, but I'm not see anything issues. Valoem 04:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- You restored unreliable sources and unsourced content. Please read the section below. QuackGuru (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
DS alert
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 QuackGuru (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Warning
Hi. I noticed you and RexxS at loggerheads at Talk:PAX Labs, and on each other's pages. I won't make the call as to who is right or wrong, since RexxS is a friend of mine who often helps me with technical issues. But I note this edit by you, where you strike out RexxS's support for a merge (!) with the edit summary "removed comment from RexxS editor has personal reason for voting deletion". Since you're an experienced editor, you should really know better than to tamper with another person's comment. Also don't attack them like that in the edit summary. What are you saying, anyway? "Personal reason"? As in, you think RexxS has a personal animosity against the company..? It sounds ridiculous on the face of it. You may well be topic banned from the Electronic cigarette topic area (see the discretionary sanctions alert above) if you continue to act like that. (Also, please don't post on a user's page after they have asked you not to.) Bishonen | talk 10:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC).