Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:46, 27 September 2006

• User Talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 1:April-July 2006
• User Talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 2: July-August 2006

My sincerest appologies

Mr. Nawlin, I am truly sorry for calling you a racist. It is just that when people go around accusing me of making my tribe up, I gte horrifically offended, my tribe tried for years to be recognized as a country's tribe, and finally we triumphed, Malawi accepted us! We were exstatic! If I offended you, I am truly sorry, and I will redo a whole new page on our tribe, once I find a website to site my sources. My whole point was that I just made the page yesterday, and had not gotten a chance to site my sources.

Hmmmm...

That comment is true! How many tribes do you know of, get created in 1995, then almost 11 years later, get to be a tribe of an african country? We are the first that I have heard of.

DELETE ME

DELETE ME! See if give adays care, you do not take into considerationn that the Serozza are a REAL tribe of Malawi (an Eastern African COuntry), which does have a Queen! If there is going to be such racism on this website, then DELETE ME! You people make me sick! Your racism and slers, are what makes this world wrong. Do you even know that there are thousands of Kings and Queens in Africa, not just europe? I suggest that do some research, and get your facts straight! Our new webpage will be up soon, and Just beacause you "think" that I "made this lineage" up, just means that you are a pessimist! Only about 100 out of the like, 100,000 tribes of Africa have any information on their tribes on the internet.

Queen Lucretia I (deleted?)

NawlinWiki, I dont see why you refer to this page as vandalism, I just started it yesterday, and am trying to finish it, that is why there are no sources and it has very little content, but thats why I was working on it this morning. Why do you call it vandalism? Its only a Biographical page? Such as one for the other tribal leaders of Africa?

Fwenty

I spent over an hour on a barely fictional word that has been in existence for years and years. Hundreds of people know about it, and I don't see why you can't spare a few kilobytes for my page. What? Bandwidth problems? Then who had the idea of creating an online encyclopedia? If I have to get a petition for my page, I can assure you I can get at least a hundred people easy. By what basis is the word nonsense? I bet I can name an obscure Indian or African language with only 10 speakers. But of course, that is valid over 100 people. Fwenty is real, its 35, and you shouldn't be so stingy on deciding which pages stay.

Quick question about new article validity

I created a page about an amateur baseball league in Boston, the BMBL, and they run a notable charity event each year, called the 100 Inning Game, to raise money for Curt's Pitch for ALS. Each year, either Curt Schilling or his wife, Ronda Schilling, makes an appearance at this event, and it usually garners a lot of media attention, both local and regional (and occasionally national, such as last year when one of the primary umpires suffered from ALS, which made it a big human-interest story for even the big news outlets), and is the record holder for the longest regulation baseball game ever played (Guiness World Records application still pending). Is this notable enough to warrant a Misplaced Pages article if supported with proper citation? I have created the article at 100 Inning Game and would like you to look at it as it grows (I still need to add a lot more to it, so please allow a few days for me to finish the article) and see if it's notable enough to warrant continued existance. Thank you! -- Ubergenius 16:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Dark Abrahms

Why would you do that? Why would you intentionally delete the article I was working on when I specifically requested the opposite? I gave a reasonable explanation for my point, I think that I at least deserve the same from you. I feel the way you dealt with my article (which IS relevant by the way, look it up) was unfair, unjust, and disappointing.

However, I understand that my article was incomplete, a situation which I was hard a work remedying. I will create a more substantial article on Gregory Mitchell Darr, and hopefully this new one will meet everyone's approval!

The article in question was about a prodigious young con man "Gregory Mitchell Darr". Once again I would like to emphasize that this is NOT an attack page or vanity page. But do not worry if it is unsalvageable; I have the original text saved and can expect several more full pages on the aforementioned topic.

Thanks very much for your consideration, sincerely

• Thanks for your corrections and suggestions. As you may have guessed, this is my first wikipedia article, and

I am still unfamiliar with all the conventions. I had planned to add verifiable sources a bit later on as well as adding a whole lot more content. On a side note, little is known about Darr's past; he was orphaned at the age of five. But, hopefully with the input from you and other wikipedians, my next article will be much improved! I will definetely be sure to include my sources and back all of this information up! Thanks again!*

Dark Abrahms 21:15, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Dark Abrahms

Siipola12

you kinda suck huh buddy? deleting peoples work just because you personally find it irrelevent. Encyclopedia: 'a book or set of books containing articles on various topics, usually in alphabetical arrangement, covering all branches of knowledge'.... any knowledge of subjects can be listed, they dont have to be historical as long as their factual.

Miss Lou Lou

What's going on? I got an A7 - what is taht? I had done so much work on that dern thing.

DARCA

DARCA nyl is from the star wars tales comics he was in about 20 different issues thats where he from

US Agencies

Why revert my edits? I added a reference on the discussion page? Seanjd 02:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I made some more significant changes to the article on the Board of Tea - feel free to correct/check the references on the updated page. Seanjd 06:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Reza rizvi

Good point about the first same sex marriage claim. Erechtheus 16:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Fixed-Wind Aircraft Edit

Thanks for your message. I was not experimenting with the page. There were TWO pages with the same title and if you look at the history, there was a very foul language phrase used in the duplicate page for the fixed-wing aircraft. I removed that and was then trying to re-direct this to the actual fixed-wing aircraft page. Thanks for removing the duplicate page altogether! -)

I understand. I will have to learn how to do that! Will look out on the Help section.

User:Egnp

I made the same mistake as you a few weeks back, thought that a user like this was creating fake user pages, when they were, in fact, tagging banned vandals. I made myself look silly by reporting it to AIV (not the first or last time). Seems every day a new username is created to tag the user pages of vandals. Maybe a throwaway username is used to prevent retaliation? I'm guessing it's a sock of some admin or volunteer editor. Fan-1967 18:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the rvv!

Bones for Life rev 2

Since you were the one that caught the original Bones for Life -- Wellness through Movement Intelligence article, would you have time to take a look at the second attempt at the article, Bones for Life? Basically, they're not linking as they did earlier, and are coming up with references after a great deal of prodding to do so. I'd appreciate it if an experienced editor such as yourself could offer some perspective. --Ronz 20:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Strange delete

• (cur) (last) 2006-08-30T06:21:37 DarknessLord (Talk | contribs | block) (moved Captain Underpants 2: The Attack of the Talking Toilets to *%)
• 2006-08-31T19:32:50 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "*%" (vandalism)

Did you fall for a vandalistic page move and delete a valid article here? I have no other clue why you or anyone else would want to delete the article - Tdxiang wanted to put it for AfD but got only as far as slapping the {{afd}} tag on it. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

let us, you and i, discuss your actions against the large garden bumblebee...

shame on you.

if there were an unattractive award for people who busy themselves stripping the internet of loveliness, i would give it to you. that is all i have to say, really.

sincerely, myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Echolalias (talk • contribs)

• Response -- not sure what this is about, probably some nonsense article that I speedied. NawlinWiki 03:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

G8

What is g8?--Hamedog_Talk| 13:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

the deleted & lovely bumblebee business

"The Large Garden bumblebee is most typically a bee, that bumbles around a large garden. However, it could also be a large bee that bumbles around a more modestly proportioned garden."

that was incredible & you are a monster for deleting it. where is your shame? what about bunnies, sir? i ask you: do you delete bunnies in your spare time? i bet you wouldn't have any qualms with deleting bunnies. large garden bumblebee was a little, pink-nosed bunny, quivering under a leaf in the garden that is the internet...his fluffy tail twitching with utter adorableness.

and then you came with your shotgun.

• Response The above pretty much speaks for itself. NawlinWiki 22:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Response say... just what are you implying by that? if you feel horrible, you should say so.--Echolalias 22:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Response This is the best comment ever. If being an admin means invoking bunny-wrath, maybe I'll consider it. -- Merope 20:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR

What is 3RR? VanM 22:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. VanM 22:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Zombies

That article submitted by User:Kitler005, whom you blocked for being vandal-only? It wasn't gibberish. It was a direct copypaste of the first chapter of The Zombie Survival Guide. You may want to reconsider the block. DS 18:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Supriem David Rockefeller

Hello. I noticed that you speedy deleted an article, Supriem David Rockefeller, under CSD a1 as patent nonsense. I am not the author, but last I saw the article, it said "Supriem David Rockefeller is Chairman of S.D. Rockefeller Holdings, Ltd", or something to that effect. I did find this press release: "S.D. Rockefeller Holdings, LTD. Announces Supriem (Bank and Trust Company), The Future of Banking". I also found this MySpace page: SUPRIEM ROCKEFELLER at MySpace. Is this some kind of elaborate hoax? Was the article changed after I saw it? What am I missing? (I am not at all questioning your decision to delete; I'm honestly just curious...) Thanks for your time, Satori Son 19:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Thanks for the info. Very weird. --Satori Son 20:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello i was the author about Supriem David Rockefeller and this is not a hoax is very real here is my msn if you want to be in contact with me hamshel@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geniusmx (talk • contribs)

Your speedy deletion of Spherical cow

Not that I disagree with the outcome, but just in case you would like to know: this article was not actually nonsense (see Google results), but a copyvio from that I was just about to tag as such. Best, Sandstein 20:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Socket M

Thanks for taking care of that move for me. jgp _C 11:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Your WP:AIV Comment

Regarding your note on this user, you did not block the user because they 'were not warned', although they were in fact warned at 10:17 (UTC), before they vandalised for the 3rd through 5th times, when they posted abusive images labelled as students and staff in an obvious personal attack. This account seems to be created only for vandalism purposes, I would ask you to reconsider your decision to not immediately block this user. Thank you for your efforts --DanielBC 11:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Your archived talk pages...

...were hosted at Talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 2: July-August 2006 instead of User Talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 2: July-August 2006. I've moved them to the User Talk namespace and tagged the old articles with {{db-g6}} (which, since you're an admin, you can delete, I guess). I was looking at my article talk space edit count and was confused that you were listed, but it's an easy enough mistake. I hope I didn't step on your toes! Cheers. -- Merope 20:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Also, since I'm anal about stuff like this (which explains why I'm on Misplaced Pages), one archive is called "Archive 1" and the other is called "Archive 2: July-August 2006". Maybe you want to name them consistently? Or ... y'know, not. Whatever. Anyway, I'll go back to wikifying articles and leave you alone.  :) -- Merope 20:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Spherical cow

You recently deleted this page as nonsense, and I though it was too, but your db-speedy tag got in before mine. It was a fun page so I made a copy of it. I now believe it's for real - so I'm recreating it. --ArmadilloFromHell 00:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Folse

No problem. Go for it. alphaChimp 02:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Very, very nice job on John Folse. :) alphaChimp 05:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of Misplaced Pages:Numbers need citations

Hi there. I was recently participating in a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Numbers need citations, and was surprised to find the page deleted. I investigated further and discovered that this was due to "g5" of the speedy deletion criteria (created by a sock puppet of a banned user). I'm bringing this to your attention because you were the deleting admin. I've had this happen at least once before (have a talk page suddenly disappear on me), and that time I managed to save the page and debate (if I remember the example, I will provide a link). In this case, I wanted to somehow save the debate that had been taking place on the talk page of this proposed guideline - with a view to adding something of the sort to WP:CITE or a related page. There were some useful comments on that talk page. I'd appreciate any advice on how best to handle this. I've also copied this to User_talk:Mackensen (the CheckUser involved). Thanks. Carcharoth 06:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

A quick update. User:Mackensen has confirmed that this is your responsibility, not his. Hope you can let me know what is best to do here. Oh. I see you've already dealt with it. Hang on. I'll start a new response. Carcharoth 12:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

A response as promised. First, thanks for copying the content out to my subpage, however, I feel that this is not a fully adequate solution for several reasons. Firstly, there is no edit history to that text (just a record that you put it there). This means that the edits I made to that page are no longer in my contributions log. Similarly for other good-faith GFDL contributions to the discussion. I believe that this is not acceptable under the GFDL. For the similar case which I was referring to above, please see the debate that took place here. I would prefer to see a similar process take place here, with the proposed guideline page undeleted, then modified or rejected or redirected to the appropriate place (there are suggestions on the talk page already). This would prevent unintentional recreation (quite possible in good faith in cases like this), and would preserve the debate in the correct location with its full edit history. Please let me know what you think of this proposal. If you think I should try and get policy in general changed on this before requesting this, or taking this to deletion review, I would be happy to do so. Thanks. Carcharoth 12:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I have a slight problem though. I hope you will be able to advise. I am going to be away for a week soon. Do you think I should start the review anyway, or wait until I can give it my full attention? I'm guessing I should wait really, as I need to gather lots of links together. The deleted stuff will still be undeletable when I get back, right? And the deletion review doesn't have a time by when you have to start the review by does it? On the other hand, my views are pretty much laid out (or could be soon) now, so I could just find out what has happened when I get back. Hmm. Carcharoth 14:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I didn't have time in the end. I'll do it when I get back. Thanks. Carcharoth 07:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Behave

When reverting vandalism, please try not to ride roughshod over other peoples edits by wantonly reverting all changes in between. CiaranG 14:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

niger vandal

I'm sorry, I misread the time of his last vandalism. On the other hand, his talk page does state "This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Misplaced Pages in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning." I'll keep monitoring. :-) --Storkk 15:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of Wizzerds article

Thanx. I was just putting a delete page template on the article when you deleted it. how do you delete an article without putting the template on it? Thats a useful thing to know. Ilikefood 15:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Newsz

He has a sock called Acacaz. --Dweller 15:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

vote for me

im nominated for system operator (sysop) or admin vote for me please! vote here i love wikipedia and would love it if you voted for me so i can continue to contribute and help out even more! Qrc2006 16:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Lygisaurus

Normally I wouldn't suggest deletion for a scientific category like that, but there's no text in the "article" and there's been no action there since January. Surely that's long enough to wait for text to be added? --Tim4christ17  17:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Corporal Bryce Jeffrey Keller: prod/db-bio question

Hi. I see you reverted my db-bio on the above page back to a prod. I'm fine with that -- but I'd like to know if that's your intention for all nn people with prod tags? I recently changed quite a few (see my contributions - they're all marked obviously) but I don't think they should be changed back wholesale. I'd offer to help with it myself, but I'm off to bed. Please reply on my talk to let me know your response, as I was planning to get to some more people listed with prod tags (thinking I was helping out). I have been trying to keep it uncontroversial... please keep that in mind. Thanks for your time! --Storkk 03:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, I was just asked by User:TruthbringerToronto to only add a prod2 tag instead of speedying it. I'll do that from now on, unless I hear more about it from one of you. I also disagree with his assertion that the page should be moved, as that leaves a redirect on WP, but oh well. Thanks for your reply. --Storkk 04:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

‎Kentucky deluxe

Can you take a look at this article and tell me what the proper course of action is? As it stands, it is rubbish. The product may be real, though likely not very notable, but the description is nonsense. At the same time, the db-nonsense tag does not seem appropriate. What are your thoughts? ---Charles 04:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

It is certainly a great deal better. Looking at it now, I realize I could have done just what you did, if I had given it some thought. Thanks. ---Charles 04:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Paul Dacre

I posted a request to block an editor yesterday because of what I perceived as vandalism on the aforementioned article. You said, perhaps rightly, that it's a content dispute and I'm willing to accept that but where do I go from here? The guy is still posting that Paul Dacre is a paedophile, sexist and racist (which I'm quite sure he's not). I'd be glad to be given a little guidance. Paulhinds 12:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Cheers Paulhinds 12:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

From the desk of eastham

ha -- in the time I was writing a {{db}} tag asking for speedy & protect, you... speedied and protected. fast work. thanks! bikeable (talk) 17:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

From the desk of eastham

Thanks for the quick action on this one. I did not catch the name of the page creator. I was going to post a warning on his talk page for adding nonsense. Is he a constant source of vandalism? ---Charles 17:18, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Only Path to God

I am still working on this article and it was not yet finished - Could you tell me on which basic you deleted the article? Other religion do have a point to make as well. It would help if you could wait until the article is completed - Why the rush? --Hari Singh 20:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Further to your message, please refer to my comments at Talk:Only_Path_to_God. Many thanks. --Hari Singh 00:52, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of User:Robomaeyhem/Infobox hurricane user

You deleted that page. I'm not exactly sure why, given I tagged Template:Infobox hurricane user as speedy and not its target page. – Chacor 01:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Anyhow, I've asked another admin to undelete it. Cheers. – Chacor 01:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Retra

I have noticed when you closed the above AfD, you did not remove the category template, "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD". By deleting this when closing it pulls the discussion out of the category. I have deleted it from this discussion, but if you could review any other closures you have done recently and remove the tag from them it would be greatly appreicated. Thanks. --Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Serial hoaxer back

Thought you might like to know, the serial hoaxer is back as has created a couple articles. One, Nife Party is a direct re-create (and I've tagged it as such), the other is an album supposedly from that band (Have A Knife Time). Not sure what to do with that one... --AbsolutDan 04:12, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Great work, keep it up! --AbsolutDan 04:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Brent Corrigan/Comments‎

I'm pretty sure that creating an article called Brent Corrigan/Comments in the main Misplaced Pages namespace is an improper way to go about whatever it is that is being done. There's a discussion page on Brent Corrigan for comments, and any personal side project page the author wants to do should probably be done as an adjunct to his own userpage, no? wikipediatrix 05:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

The Disney/Barney vandal

aka 207.250.22.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) ... committed further vandalism after your test4 warning. The (3rd) report was dismissed as "inactive vandal". Now... there's no other warning after test4, plus it would go against the credibility of the same test that states "you will be blocked". I had in mind something custom-made such as "You have been identified as a student of Brown Deer School. You are herein requested for the last time to stop vandalizing pages (or maybe leave Misplaced Pages altogether). Actions against you may include blocking of your IP range and a report with full logs including IP and times of access filed with your school which will be asked to deal with the situation." Yet I have this feeling that that would not be within Wiki policy though, and in fact encourage the vandal to "try me out". What to do? _└  / _talk  08:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

AND he's back... Same IP. _└  / _talk  22:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Request for unprotection

Hello, is it possible for you to unprotect User talk:Ya ya ya ya ya ya? His block appears to have expired because he is making more edits. I am trying to post a warning/reply to his accusation on my talk page. Thanks. Green caterpillar 13:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually, his block has not expired. Never mind. Green caterpillar 13:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Massive copyvios at Asiatic Cheetah

I understand that the Asiatic cheetah is real, but I thought the article needed to be speedied as a 100% copyvio which included a commercial source in one of the text dumps used. Why is tagging the article with a cleanup tag appropriate when the whole thing needs a complete rewrite due to copyright violations? Jesse Viviano 13:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

deletion of a page

you said id didnt meet WP:Music or something like that...explain what that is, its a band...look them up on google, they have plenty of pages, just because you havent heard of them dosent mean theyre not and also

Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. An article that fails to even claim that the subject of the article is notable can be speedy deleted under criterion A7, however. A mere claim of notability, even if contested, may avoid deletion under A7 and require a full Article for Deletion process to determine if the subject of the article is notable.

Superme 22:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

PS. the page was on the damn request list, i was fufilling (sp?) the request i put there that no one else was fufilling(sp?)

• Note responded on Superme's talk page. NawlinWiki 23:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks i guess

can you help me then, in all honesty i dont know how to work Misplaced Pages and i dont know A LOT about the band

Superme 23:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Joe Boswell

Don't know if you actually wanted Joe boswell/Joe Boswell deleted, but I didn't see a log for it so I listed it at AFD after the individual removed my prod. - CobaltBlueTony 17:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! - CobaltBlueTony 19:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Could you undelete User:Moe Epsilon/monobook.js for me? Thanks! — Moe Epsilon 21:52 September 11 '06

Thanks! — Moe Epsilon 21:55 September 11 '06

Brody Ruckus on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Brody Ruckus. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. --Mark Yen 04:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Why did you redirect ?

Why did you redirect Borrisoleigh GAA (Gnevin 15:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC))

Owe ok i didnt notice the confusion surrounding it , redirect is best (Gnevin 15:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC))

Re:email

Many thanks. --Storkk 22:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism revert

No problem. Glad to have helped. – Chacor 04:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

"George Macaca Allen"

For benefit of your misinformed self; please check the number of references here ... already over 28,700 :-)

• Response -- it's still a redirect created solely to disparage a person, therefore violating WP:NPOV. User blocked. NawlinWiki 14:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Delete input requested

If you have a moment, I'd appreciate you looking into something and giving me an opinion. I prodded a series of local amateur mens' baseball teams in Boston as non-notable. The teams are listed at Boston Men's Baseball League, and an example team is Boston Senators. There is no claim to notability of these individual teams, so I thought prod was appropriate. The prod has been removed on each of them, and the talk page of each contains a note which reads, "I have removed the deletion notice just this once... If an admin determines it is still not worthy of existance, simply readd the deletion notice, I will allow it to go quietly." Would you mind rendering an opinion? Or, should these go to AfD? Thanks! Akradecki 18:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Done, thanks for the advice. Akradecki 19:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Again, may I ask why this is considered non-notable? While the individual teams may not have specific, recognizable notability, they are a component to a prominent amateur league in Boston, the BMBL. Ubergenius 14:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

An Socach

The fact that you knew An Socach was a real pile of dirt in Scotland makes me feel much stupider and much less like a box of Trivial Pursuit questions, as I used to feel. (No offense.) Not so much of a font of useless knowledge as I am accustomed to claiming, now am I? - CobaltBlueTony 18:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Jordan colley

Recreated! - CobaltBlueTony 18:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Alpha Kappa Nu

I would ask that you consider the subject's history of vandalism of Alpha Phi Alpha, his sockpuppetry, etc. in addition to the wiki definition of Attack Page, which includes creating a page to attack another entity. All is detailed in the RfC on him/her. He has had several IPs and IDs blocked.

thanks for your input. NinjaNubian/Mykungfu/Bobbydoop/Mikeandike specifically created the entry to throw dirt on an organization after admins asked him to cease his/her vandalism on the site of that vandalism. Robotam 20:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Bulldog Chain of Command

Recreated a third time! - CobaltBlueTony 16:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony 16:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi yes I know I personally think the page is neccessary for his extensive work on the rainforests but he is a cousin and has contacted me by email to say it is embarrassing him. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 21:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi yes but Jonathan is quite a sensitive guy you know he is well deserving of an article but he feels quite embarrassed by it. I don't know why. I don't want to get in his bad books. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 21:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Ban request

You placed a warning on the talk page for IP address 83.101.150.115 and I wanted to let you know that he has once again vandalized the Taboo (film series) page. I've reverted the edit, but I'm not an admin and don't know how to request a ban (except this way). Thanks! Orayzio 02:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Deleting and Locking the Jihen article.

I'd like to protest your locking the 'Jihen' article. Normally it doesn't break the rules, it's just that it keeps getting destoryed by the same user, Saturn Dreamscape. Jihen is a website, but we arn't using wikipedia as a way to promote our site. The owners of Jihen want to use the article to keep track of major events and the like that spawns from Jihen.

People don't like the webmasters' personalites, so they attack us at every chance they get. Anyway, I'd love to talk to you about this. Though, I'm not very good with words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by No-0ne (talk • contribs)

• Responded on No-0ne's talk page. NawlinWiki 03:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat!

hoopydink 04:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much for participating in my RfA, which closed successfully earlier today with a result of (60/9/4). Although, I encountered a few problems in my RfA, I have peacefully resolved my conflicts and made amends with the people involved. If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free talk to me. I hope I will live up to your expectations. --Nishkid64 22:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)