Misplaced Pages

User talk:Humus sapiens: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:23, 27 September 2006 editHossein.ir (talk | contribs)327 edits Please stop doing POV edits without reading talk pages← Previous edit Revision as of 23:26, 27 September 2006 edit undo12.64.60.248 (talk) ListenNext edit →
Line 66: Line 66:
"Please try to comply with WP:NPOV". I always have this in my mind, and I suggest this to me, you, and others. But, please, read talk pages. Have you read my comments? Please tell me your ideas about those, specially about , as it didn't get any reasonable response about them. "Please try to comply with WP:NPOV". I always have this in my mind, and I suggest this to me, you, and others. But, please, read talk pages. Have you read my comments? Please tell me your ideas about those, specially about , as it didn't get any reasonable response about them.
--] 10:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC) --] 10:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

== Listen ==

Please stop being a jerk. Before you reverse my edits or act like my version of an article is always absolute garbage, at least tell me WHY (preferably on a case-by-case basis) you do not think someone's version better serves a NPOV.

Revision as of 23:26, 27 September 2006

Home Talk List Tools Policy Cmmn Puzzle Ubx Nav
Welcome to my civilized talk page.
Archives
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13, 14, ...
...

Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or start a new topic.

?
  • Four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message would automagically sign and date it.
  • Unless asked otherwise, I may respond on your Talk page or on the Talk page of the specific article. If the dialog gets interesting, a link to the other half can be added here.
  • To send me an email message, see the left-hand panel, but I prefer to talk in the open.
  • Please follow talk page guidelines and wikiquette.

Unexplained reversal on Targeting of civilian areas in the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict

What are your reasons for indiscriminately reverting the deletion of a claim by means of WP:RS? Please note that this behaviour could be assessed as an attempt to abuse adminship. Kosmopolis 12:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

It is only fair to allow the accused side to defend itself. I don't see how reverting efforts to censor such defense can constitute "an attempt to abuse adminship", but go ahead and report me if you feel that an abuse took place. ←Humus sapiens 20:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

"legal threats"

A legal threat would be "i'm going to sue you", saying that "your behavior should be considered criminal and you should be tried" has the keyword "should" and therefore does not qualify as a threat, it is an opinion. Lordkazan 21:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

disagreeing with your interpretation is neither incivil nor belligerent. Lordkazan 00:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop doing POV edits without reading talk pages

You've reverted multiple pages of my edits without reasoning, Isn't it POV edit? Please read talk pages first, and then start reverting. Hossein.ir 09:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

"Please try to comply with WP:NPOV". I always have this in my mind, and I suggest this to me, you, and others. But, please, read talk pages. Have you read my comments? Please tell me your ideas about those, specially about , as it didn't get any reasonable response about them. --Hossein.ir 10:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Listen

Please stop being a jerk. Before you reverse my edits or act like my version of an article is always absolute garbage, at least tell me WHY (preferably on a case-by-case basis) you do not think someone's version better serves a NPOV.