| Revision as of 00:54, 28 September 2006 editByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 edits →[]: thanks← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:50, 28 September 2006 edit undoByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 edits →[]: +Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Please see my comments on the talk page there. I do not appreciate what you are doing. ] 22:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | Please see my comments on the talk page there. I do not appreciate what you are doing. ] 22:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Thanks for toning your comments down: we had an edit conflict, and I noticed, so I toned my own response down as well. It seems we have had a very unfortunate misunderstanding, and been somewhat oversensitive about things. People have those awful little "wikistress" thermometers on their userpages...my mercury has boiled and shattered the glass into my face. And I have only been on this encyclopaedia for about 3 months! ] 00:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC) | :Thanks for toning your comments down: we had an edit conflict, and I noticed that you had, so I toned my own response down as well. It seems we have had a very unfortunate misunderstanding, and been somewhat oversensitive about things. People have those awful little "wikistress" thermometers on their userpages...my mercury has boiled and shattered the glass into my face. And I have only been on this encyclopaedia for about 3 months! ] 00:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Another request. I ''really'', ''really'' don't like being associated with proponents of Heim theory; and I am certainly not one of the pile-in voters at ScienceApologist's RfA (I stay away from those). Is there any chance that you adjust your userpage so that it does not give the appearance that I am an irrational buffoon who randomly reverts positive contributions to scientific articles? I think you can see that I have well articulated reasons for doing what I did (I have written reams on the talk page justifying my removal), and even if we don't agree on some things, I don't agree with your classifying my edit as "removal of content I do not understand", when that is obviously not the case. | |||
| :As a "peace offering", I have voted delete on the Heim theory AfD (the first), for what it's worth (although I would have anyway). I have a bit of experience in these AfDs, and would have nominated Heim theory long ago, but it just won't go through. The pile-in voters will see to that. It has too much of a cult following. But it's worth a try, I guess. ] 01:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:50, 28 September 2006
archive contains earlier material from the talk page; August 2005 -- February 2006. Sdedeo (tips) 20:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
archive2 contains earlier material from the talk page; March 2006 -- June 2006. Sdedeo (tips) 23:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
archive3 contains earlier material from the talk page; June 2006 -- September 2006. Sdedeo (tips) 22:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Please post new comments to the bottom of the talk page; I will almost always respond to comments on this page itself (makes comments easier to find -- I encourage you to do the same) so check back! Sdedeo (tips) 22:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
After a couple of months contributing to wikipedia in various ways, I've found that it's no longer as much fun as before. I've decided to go on an extended wikibreak, and I wish everyone luck. Sdedeo (tips) 01:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC) I'm back, and working on medcabal again. I still have a great deal of faith in the wikipedia project. Sdedeo (tips) 22:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC) I have gone on another break; please see my user page for more discussion of this issue. Sdedeo (tips) 18:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Loop quantum gravity
Please see my comments on the talk page there. I do not appreciate what you are doing. Byrgenwulf 22:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for toning your comments down: we had an edit conflict, and I noticed that you had, so I toned my own response down as well. It seems we have had a very unfortunate misunderstanding, and been somewhat oversensitive about things. People have those awful little "wikistress" thermometers on their userpages...my mercury has boiled and shattered the glass into my face. And I have only been on this encyclopaedia for about 3 months! Byrgenwulf 00:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Another request. I really, really don't like being associated with proponents of Heim theory; and I am certainly not one of the pile-in voters at ScienceApologist's RfA (I stay away from those). Is there any chance that you adjust your userpage so that it does not give the appearance that I am an irrational buffoon who randomly reverts positive contributions to scientific articles? I think you can see that I have well articulated reasons for doing what I did (I have written reams on the talk page justifying my removal), and even if we don't agree on some things, I don't agree with your classifying my edit as "removal of content I do not understand", when that is obviously not the case.
- As a "peace offering", I have voted delete on the Heim theory AfD (the first), for what it's worth (although I would have anyway). I have a bit of experience in these AfDs, and would have nominated Heim theory long ago, but it just won't go through. The pile-in voters will see to that. It has too much of a cult following. But it's worth a try, I guess. Byrgenwulf 01:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)