Revision as of 22:35, 29 May 2017 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,816 editsm Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:TheFrog001. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:08, 31 May 2017 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,816 editsm Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:TheFrog001. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
:As the article already is a ] candidate, you only have to wait for a short time until it gets deleted. --] (]) 17:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC) | :As the article already is a ] candidate, you only have to wait for a short time until it gets deleted. --] (]) 17:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
== "DREAM ACT unconstructive" == | |||
I was simply fixing an error. There is so such thing as "undocumented immigrants" in United States law. They are referred to as "illegal aliens". This is a fact. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 28 February 2017, 18:27:24</small> | |||
:Dear ], | |||
:If what you claim were a "fact", you surely wouldn't find any document in Congress' document search containing the words "undocumented immigrants". During my research, I found 749 hits when searching for those words. You can even see for yourself . It is important to question things you encounter on the Misplaced Pages, but please, check your sources before you edit and name them in your edits. | |||
:] (]) 17:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
::Update: | |||
::Here you go: https://www.congress.gov/search?searchResultViewType=expanded&q={%22congress%22:%22all%22,%22source%22:%22legislation%22,%22search%22:%22\%22illegal+aliens\%22%22} | |||
::1646 hits. So which one is fact ? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::: Dear IP-User, | |||
:::As you can probably see, both termina are being used in law. As per ], please seek a consensus for controversial edits on the article's talk page. | |||
:::Thank you, ] (]) 14:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:08, 31 May 2017
This is an archive of past discussions with User:TheFrog001. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Welcome
|
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Are you still online?
Let me know if you are. Krett12 (talk) 18:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- I am still online. Why? TheFrog001 (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, TheFrog001. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Rollbacker
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Misplaced Pages:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 09:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you! --TheFrog001 (talk) 09:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
About German Death Camps
Hello,
what kind of source you would like to have - don't you know history - there is no Nazi land - only Germany, so there were German Death Camps, not Nazi Death camps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.95.144.247 (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello,
- You were changing a wiki link to another page, namely Nazi Germany. As this is the title of the page, I would assume that this name should be consistent throughout the whole Misplaced Pages and therefore also in that article. If you have any more questions, please contact the corresponding WP-Project or the talk page of the article. --TheFrog001 (talk) 19:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 6 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Heartthrob (album) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Section by Darby Weaver
Hello
I am in the process of updating the page with information and citations.
Darby Weaver (talk) 18:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Darby Weaver
- I am looking forward to your content. Thank you. --TheFrog001 (talk) 18:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
how can i delete Techofus atricle?
how can i delete Techofus atricle? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digisky (talk • contribs) 17:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Dear Digisky,
- As the article already is a WP:Speedy Deletion candidate, you only have to wait for a short time until it gets deleted. --TheFrog001 (talk) 17:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
"DREAM ACT unconstructive"
I was simply fixing an error. There is so such thing as "undocumented immigrants" in United States law. They are referred to as "illegal aliens". This is a fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.20.68.96 (talk) 28 February 2017, 18:27:24
- Dear 47.20.68.96,
- If what you claim were a "fact", you surely wouldn't find any document in Congress' document search containing the words "undocumented immigrants". During my research, I found 749 hits when searching for those words. You can even see for yourself here. It is important to question things you encounter on the Misplaced Pages, but please, check your sources before you edit and name them in your edits.
- 1646 hits. So which one is fact ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.20.68.96 (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Dear IP-User,
- As you can probably see, both termina are being used in law. As per WP:Consensus, please seek a consensus for controversial edits on the article's talk page.
- Thank you, TheFrog001 (talk) 14:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)