Revision as of 21:34, 2 June 2017 editIcewhiz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users38,036 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:39, 2 June 2017 edit undoAl-Andalusi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,094 edits Undid revision 783525892 by Icewhiz (talk) it's not 1RRNext edit → | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC) | <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
== Warning - Acid throwing - 1RR violation == | |||
The following revert - , coupled with the reverts you made earlier in the day (in pieces - on the same text): (new material) (following extensive discussion on talk, with majority indicating include). Are in violation of ARBPIA stipulating a 1RR rule (and this is clearly Israel/Palestine - specifically the acid attack on a family). I urge you to self-revert.] (]) 21:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:39, 2 June 2017
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
WP:ARBPIA
Please review the restrictions on pages related to the Israel-Palestinian conflict at Template:ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement. One of the restrictions says "Editors are required to obtain consensus through discussion before restoring a reverted edit." Debresser (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
A proposal for collaboration
Hello,
I saw some of your contributions, some of your talk page archives, and some other discussions you made in articles talk pages, and I saw your willingness to improve many articles. However I believe that I can help you do that by using a platform that better tracks progress (but not only that). We can thus start compiling documents which are needed for an article (like a small bibliography), find other relevant articles that are related and for which we can make additions, set some goals and parts that need change, read those sources while taking notes (that platform provides a great way to keep progress and to set milestones, so that we can make for example 100 pages of this book and this paper due for this milestone 19 May 2017), and then start merging changes and fine-tuning things... There's more to it so I was just mentioning only the very basic stuff!
Here's a link, https://github.com/seblafrite/wp/issues (make an account there and add a comment so that I can add you there)
For what it's worth, I'm fluent in both English and Arabic.
Looking forward to cooperating with you!
Yours faithfully, --177.87.112.218 (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Category:Treaties of Muhammad has been nominated for discussion
Category:Treaties of Muhammad, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)