| Revision as of 15:31, 28 May 2017 editNumerounovedant (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users13,081 edits →GA ReviewTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:55, 4 June 2017 edit undoHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,389 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> | <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> | ||
| I'll put comments soon, meanwhile I'd really appreciate it if you could review for GA. Thanks either way. <small><span style="background:#132639; padding:2px">]</span><span style="background: #FFD200;padding:2px">]</span></small> 15:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC) | I'll put comments soon, meanwhile I'd really appreciate it if you could review for GA. Thanks either way. <small><span style="background:#132639; padding:2px">]</span><span style="background: #FFD200;padding:2px">]</span></small> 15:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ==== Personal life sourcing and SYNTH concerns from Hijiri8 ==== | |||
| Not going to preemptively overhaul this review, but per I think that the sentence about him being in a relationship with his ''GOT'' co-star needs either | |||
| *(a) to be sourced to a single reliable source that explicitly supports the full claim which is not ], | |||
| *(b) to be removed, or | |||
| *(c) to be rewritten to emphasize that he didn't "confirm" anything, that "an on-and-off relationship since 2012" is a long-standing rumour that both Harington and Leslie formally denied a number of times, and that the only thing that happened in 2016 was that they were photographed kissing at a red carpet event. | |||
| Note that I'm not saying I agree or disagree that they ''are'' dating or anything like that. I just don't think Misplaced Pages should be playing the celeb gossip game, and should especially not be making double-BLP claims that are only explicitly supported by . I am not that experienced with BLPs or celebrity gossip, so I am not actually sure if option (c) would be acceptable. Ideally, we could find a better source and go with option (a), but I suspect (b) might actually be the only viable option here if the article is to pass GA review. | |||
| ] (<small>]]</small>) 01:55, 4 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:55, 4 June 2017
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) 15:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
I'll put comments soon, meanwhile I'd really appreciate it if you could review this for GA. Thanks either way. NumerounovedantTalk 15:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Personal life sourcing and SYNTH concerns from Hijiri8
Not going to preemptively overhaul this review, but per this source analysis I think that the sentence about him being in a relationship with his GOT co-star needs either
- (a) to be sourced to a single reliable source that explicitly supports the full claim which is not the case at the moment,
- (b) to be removed, or
- (c) to be rewritten to emphasize that he didn't "confirm" anything, that "an on-and-off relationship since 2012" is a long-standing rumour that both Harington and Leslie formally denied a number of times, and that the only thing that happened in 2016 was that they were photographed kissing at a red carpet event.
Note that I'm not saying I agree or disagree that they are dating or anything like that. I just don't think Misplaced Pages should be playing the celeb gossip game, and should especially not be making double-BLP claims that are only explicitly supported by one BuzzFeed article. I am not that experienced with BLPs or celebrity gossip, so I am not actually sure if option (c) would be acceptable. Ideally, we could find a better source and go with option (a), but I suspect (b) might actually be the only viable option here if the article is to pass GA review.