Misplaced Pages

:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:01, 4 June 2017 editTheDragonFire (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,698 edits Added report for Jojocc (HG) (3.1.20)Tag: Huggle← Previous edit Revision as of 17:04, 4 June 2017 edit undoAffeL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,562 edits →ReportsNext edit →
Line 28: Line 28:
::{{AIV|c}} For what it's worth, whether the sources provided for the removed content meet ] and ] standards is questionable at best, as several seem to link to dead pages or pages without substantial textual content, while others appear to be blogs and "gossip rag" type websites. Also see ]. - ] (]) 16:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC) ::{{AIV|c}} For what it's worth, whether the sources provided for the removed content meet ] and ] standards is questionable at best, as several seem to link to dead pages or pages without substantial textual content, while others appear to be blogs and "gossip rag" type websites. Also see ]. - ] (]) 16:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
* {{Vandal|Jojocc}} – vandalism, including: ] ] ] ] ] (]) 17:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC) * {{Vandal|Jojocc}} – vandalism, including: ] ] ] ] ] (]) 17:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
* {{Vandal|Jojocc}} and {{IPvandal|110.81.201.183}}(same person) This user keeps on doing vandal on wiki and wont stop, he has been warned by me and other editors and refuse to discuss in the talk page. He is removing sourced content from wikipedia articles. - ] (]) 17:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:04, 4 June 2017

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. Shortcut

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 16:00 on 25 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Only the most recent warning is current. The others are all stale (from last year). Ad Orientem (talk) 16:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
    Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. For what it's worth, whether the sources provided for the removed content meet WP:VERIFIABLE and WP:RELIABLE standards is questionable at best, as several seem to link to dead pages or pages without substantial textual content, while others appear to be blogs and "gossip rag" type websites. Also see WP:BLPGOSSIP. - Vianello (Talk) 16:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
    Categories: