| Revision as of 14:54, 28 September 2006 editRory096 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,325 editsm whoops← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:00, 30 September 2006 edit undoSPUI (talk | contribs)75,418 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 243: | Line 243: | ||
| ==Miighan-Kurt guy== | ==Miighan-Kurt guy== | ||
| Rory is grrreat :)) Thanks for your kindness Rory , Sorry if I wasn't supposed to write anything here, just want to say thanks and that you are great :)) <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | Rory is grrreat :)) Thanks for your kindness Rory , Sorry if I wasn't supposed to write anything here, just want to say thanks and that you are great :)) <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
| ==SRNC being used as a model for other polls== | |||
| --] (] - ]) 12:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:00, 30 September 2006
Other Projects: wikt, meta, commons, newsNumber of times this page has been vandalized: 0
Archive (January 29, 2006 to March 16, 2006)
Archive2 (March 16, 2006 to March 26, 2006)
Archive3 (March 26, 2006 to April 5, 2006)
Archive4 (April 5, 2006 to April 21, 2006)
Archive5 (April 21, 2006 to May 3, 2006)
Archive6 (May 4, 2006 to May 21, 2006)
Archive7 (May 22, 2006 to June 5, 2006)
Archive8 (June 5, 2006 to June 22, 2006)
Archive9 (June 22, 2006 to September 8, 2006)
Hrm
You may want to avoid doing stuff like this, or you'll get a bad name. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 04:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yes, this to, should I get out my trusty {{bv}}? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 04:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- I think a {{test4im}} might be in order here. --Rory096 04:35, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Odd edit
Uhh... not sure what happened here . You seem to be running a bot, but things went a little haywire there. -- Gogo Dodo 04:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oh dear, my bot seems to be out of control and I cant stop it. Help! --Rory096 04:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm just kidding, btw, it's an IRC joke. --Rory096 04:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- And I wasn't running a bot, not sure where you got that from. --Rory096 04:35, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- I hope nobody (including Gogo Dodo) holds this against Rory096, ever. Otherwise I'll feel bad too. He's a great Wikipedian. The whole incident was just an IRC joke gone horribly wrong! -- Jasabella 10:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm just kidding, btw, it's an IRC joke. --Rory096 04:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
 |
You were blocked for vandalism to people's userpages, I think.... actually, Teke provided the reason "Shhhh" in the block log, so I have no idea, do you? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 04:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- It appears to be a case of rouge adminning. I suggest makeup remover. --Rory096 04:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- I was thinking something more like this. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 04:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 11th.
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 37 | 11 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| Carnildo resysopped | Report from the Hungarian Misplaced Pages |
| News and notes | Features and admins |
| Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
David Blaine Article
yeah you reversed my edits on the david blaine page. you realise you basically have a press release on here for david blaine. i was just removing self-promotional "fluff" from the page. Nick 12 September 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.164.195.56 (talk • contribs) .
- Sorry, I thought it was vandalism, as I didn't look very closely. I have reverted my edit. --Rory096 14:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- cheers matey! Nick 12 September 2006
Michael Milenski
While the article Michael Milenski does appear to be written by its subject, it clearly asserts the importance of the subject and is thus not subject to speedy deletion under CSD A7. See WP:SPEEDY for the criteria for speedy deletion. Geoffrey Spear 14:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- To the contrary, it's about a director of a seemingly non notable opera (we don't have an article on it, under 1000 ghits) that is full of weasel words that seem to imply notability, but don't directly assert it. It's borderline. --Rory096 14:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Page move
Yes, I agree, that was a typo as I was trying to move it to gas operation but did not know about the discussion on the talk page. Sorry about that. Paliku 16:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Warning
The so called vandalism you have posted on my disscusion page is bogus. It happened during an editing mistake (you actually reverted it while i was trying to correct it). Now that you know, will you please remove your bogus warning? 150.208.140.13 16:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- I've struck it. --Rory096 16:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks man150.208.140.13 19:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Uhhhh
Do I ever get an apology from you? Juppiter 21:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
?
Not sure what that's all about, but everything posted can be verified by 1, researching the Sapulpa Daily Herald and 2, interviewing the parties involved! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.149.42.237 (talk • contribs) .
- I'm not sure what you're talking about, but if half the things can only be verified by interviewing the parties, then it's OR and violates WP:V. --Rory096 04:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
My RFA
Thank you, Rory, for voting on my RFA, which succeeded 95 to 1. I remember the night I was nominated, and how you had a bit much to drink that night. Only made sense that your support vote had "will expand when sober." Anyways, now that I'm an admin, I hope I can live up to the standards of being an admin. Thank you for the support! —this is messedrocker (talk) 08:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Template:RfA
Regarding your request on my talk page, perhaps you could first change the RfA template, and then I could fix my bot. The bot should not mind the updated headings, it will only result in the mathbot's line going to the bottom. Doing things in this order will make it easier to update the code of the bot. You can reply here if you have comments, I will keep your talk page on my watchlist. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 18th.
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 38 | 18 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
September Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
Highway drama
I may need some backup at Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style (U.S. state highways)#Minnesota if Jonathunder decides to revert. Thanks. --SPUI (T - C) 18:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 25th.
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 39 | 25 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Miighan-Kurt guy
Rory is grrreat :)) Thanks for your kindness Rory , Sorry if I wasn't supposed to write anything here, just want to say thanks and that you are great :)) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Muhammed Sonny Mercan (talk • contribs) .
SRNC being used as a model for other polls
--SPUI (T - C) 12:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)