| Revision as of 15:51, 2 May 2017 editCyphoidbomb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users166,474 edits →Deleting article Wasi Shah: R← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:22, 26 June 2017 edit undoGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,287 edits →This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
| ]]: Misplaced Pages gives you last warning to not delete wanted pages and very valuable pages otherwise you will be loss of editing. Many years before you had deleted this but I forgiven. But your attempt was too hard. Now reply, pagal insaan. ] (]) 13:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC) | ]]: Misplaced Pages gives you last warning to not delete wanted pages and very valuable pages otherwise you will be loss of editing. Many years before you had deleted this but I forgiven. But your attempt was too hard. Now reply, pagal insaan. ] (]) 13:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :I've responded to this on your talk page, Shah. ] (]) 15:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC) | :I've responded to this on your talk page, Shah. ] (]) 15:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on == | |||
| This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at: | |||
| ''']''' | |||
| Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox. | |||
| The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is: | |||
| *15 June 2015 RfC: ''']'''. | |||
| The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of '''omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' "''' and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, '''institutions''' etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "'''in any article'''". | |||
| The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is: | |||
| *31 December 2015 RfC: ''']'''. | |||
| The result of that RfC was that the "'''in all Misplaced Pages articles, without exception''', nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.". | |||
| Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --] (]) 03:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:22, 26 June 2017
The ArbCom as currently constructed and staffed has amply demonstrated that not only is it incapable of accomplishing the sole task for which it was established (To provide resolution to disputes that the community has been unable to resolve), it has become the locus from which disruption emanates. Vote NO on every candidate to prevent further validation of this farce.
HURRY, HURRY, HURRY!
Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!
The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.
The most ethical show in the big top!
| This is TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive
Edit Request
I think the User:Rishika.dhanawade has added some unnecessary content through https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Karan_Singh_Grover&diff=683440263&oldid=682956824 to Karan Singh Grover. Please can you remove it. Regards., Digvijay411 (talk) 2:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Edit request
Hello!!!!! TheRedPenOfDoom I have made some recent edits to Hera Pheri 3 added and removed some content.There was a lot of irrelevant content in the article. I tried to make some changes as they are being verified by well known bollywood celebrity news website(Pinkvilla and others). After your edit I am guessing you made something wrong and deleted some important lines and stories. Please revert it to it's earlier state. Regards, Jashafi24 (talk) 8:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Aahil Raza Ibrahim
I have again opened the article Aahil Raza Ibrahim as now it has been improved and provided reliable references from newspapers User:Rishika.dhanawade — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishika.dhanawade (talk • contribs)
link deletion reasoning
Back in 2013 you deleted several external links from the Sutro Baths page...
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sutro_Baths&type=revision&diff=584939912&oldid=584939840
One of those links was to this pages: http://www.cliffhouseproject.com/environs/sutrobaths/sutro_baths.htm
This is a site I maintain. This page contains more Sutro Baths historical photographs than you will find anywhere, many from my own collection. There are no ads or malicious content. The national park service links to my website for historical information. What was the purpose of your deletion?
gary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.84.116.86 (talk • contribs)
Edit request
Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom I have made some recent edits to Karanvir Bohra added and removed some content.Some user thinks that there is lot of irrelevant content in the article. Please can you help improving it.Please can you remove the data you feel is irrelevant. Regards, Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 5:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Edit Request
Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom, Thank you for fullfilling my request and improving the article Karanvir Bohra. I also want to make a request to you to remove all the unnecessary trivia from the page Karan Singh Grover.It has too much of unnecessary stuff in the personal life section. Even in the career section things such as the actor being mobbed in public places and being appreciated by costars and colleagues have been added which I feel is inappropriate to be added over there. I had tried removing the content some time ago. But there is some user Durr-e-shehwar who again reverts my edits.Please can you take some steps against improvement of the article.
Regards,
Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 4:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Warning2
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Forrester Research
I see you removed a reference to Forrester Research. Isn't it encyclopedic?NSpehler (talk) 2:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Poor ref on DeD
Pen, i clearly understood your point i always have, that's why i never interrupt on the edits of other editors you undid. But in my case i am confident that my content is true and authentic, and is written in a way it should be written. And your concern with the sources, i am removing as less important references as i can. I already deleted refrences that were twice used or according to you is not ok. Tell me you remove my critical reception part, where as strong sources were presented such as Dawn News and Aaaj News, in rating section i used official and authentic Broadcasters' Audience Research Board references and BizAsia an Indian online rating channel for UKs programming. Tell me are these invalid or Crap sources?.
I am not user Sammy.joseph who is new to Misplaced Pages, i have made series of an article and they are believed to be good and never question. In Pakistan Television Industry media sources are very few who are acclaimed but that doesn't mean they are crap. No matter how much you referred me to Misplaced Pages policies or rules, i know them very well. I am asking you to believe in my edits and i will try to clean as much CRAP as possible and actually i always have. Fushan007 9:244, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
why did you delete image
it said you deleted an image from the page harley huke for copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lux44-musicpages (talk • contribs)
Deleting article Wasi Shah
Hello! I know that this article was deleted previously, but it doesn't mean that you delete all articles that are completely change than previous article of same name. Now listen:
: Misplaced Pages gives you last warning to not delete wanted pages and very valuable pages otherwise you will be loss of editing. Many years before you had deleted this but I forgiven. But your attempt was too hard. Now reply, pagal insaan. International Editor Shah (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- I've responded to this on your talk page, Shah. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:
Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.
The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:
- 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".
The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:
- 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.
The result of that RfC was that the "in all Misplaced Pages articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".
Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)