Misplaced Pages

Talk:Arbitration: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:40, 1 October 2006 editFresheneesz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,056 edits added link to arbitration comittee← Previous edit Revision as of 00:58, 1 October 2006 edit undoFresheneesz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,056 edits →added link to arbitration comitteeNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:


I've added a link to the arbitration comittee on this page. It is quite standard to add things like that to pages such as ], ], ], etc. Please discuss it if you want to delete this obvious addition. ] 00:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC) I've added a link to the arbitration comittee on this page. It is quite standard to add things like that to pages such as ], ], ], etc. Please discuss it if you want to delete this obvious addition. ] 00:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

:I've noticed that you've been adding a hat note on top of the ] article. This is not the best course of action, since we really don't need to advertise our committee on that page, plus I don't think people go to the Arbitration article looking for our ArbCom. Please take a look at ] for more details. —] ] 00:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:58, 1 October 2006

A proposed outline

The article has now been moved to Arbitration in the United States of America, as everyone seemed to think it ought. I've put a stub here as a filler - let's keep in mind that the article on arbitration generally should be as internationalist as possible. Here's what I think we should have here:

  • The arbitral process
    • the nature of arbitration / features common to all types of arbitration
    • the arbitrators
    • the arbitral award
  • Specific types of arbitration
    • Commercial arbitration
      • History
      • Special features
      • International commercial arbitration (this will probably need an article of its own - this section should only provide an overview)
      • Investor-state arbitration
    • Labour arbitration
    • Arbitration between states
    • Other types of arbitration (family arbitration, consumer arbitration, etc.)
  • Major arbitral institutions

Does that look like something we could use as a starting point? -- Arvind 10:23, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Sounds like a decent starting point to me. There are probably a few other sub-headings that can go in later (appeals; International arbitation bodies, etc.) but we can refine it as we go. Legis 16:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

added link to arbitration comittee

I've added a link to the arbitration comittee on this page. It is quite standard to add things like that to pages such as vandalism, guideline, point of view, etc. Please discuss it if you want to delete this obvious addition. Fresheneesz 00:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I've noticed that you've been adding a hat note on top of the Arbitration article. This is not the best course of action, since we really don't need to advertise our committee on that page, plus I don't think people go to the Arbitration article looking for our ArbCom. Please take a look at WP:ASR for more details. —this is messedrocker (talk) 00:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)