Misplaced Pages

ClueBot NG: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:35, 3 July 2017 view source223.227.96.39 (talk) Rewrie lead, get rid of "CBNG" and language=en in citations← Previous edit Revision as of 05:33, 3 July 2017 view source Elephantable (talk | contribs)3 editsm Added honest facts.Next edit →
Line 14: Line 14:


==Criticism== ==Criticism==
Critics have stated that the bot ] new users, by not being able to apply a human brain's knowledge to the edit, and leaving impersonal templates which deter users from contributing in helpful ways. Some have called it "rubbish", and tried to have the bot shut down.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/PetitionToGetRidOfCluebotNgWikipedia/|title=Security Check Required|website=www.facebook.com|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.quora.com/How-does-Wikipedias-content-review-bot-ClueBot-NG-review-Misplaced Pages-pages-and-validate-their-facts|title=How does Misplaced Pages's content review bot ClueBot NG review Misplaced Pages pages and validate their facts? - Quora|website=www.quora.com|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/bots-edit-wikipedia-humans-made/|title=The Bots Who Edit Misplaced Pages (And The Humans Who Made Them)|work=MakeUseOf|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref> Critics have stated that the bot ] new users, by not being able to apply a human brain's knowledge to the edit, and leaving impersonal templates which deter users from contributing in helpful ways. Some have called it "rubbish", and tried to have the bot shut down.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/PetitionToGetRidOfCluebotNgWikipedia/|title=Security Check Required|website=www.facebook.com|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.quora.com/How-does-Wikipedias-content-review-bot-ClueBot-NG-review-Misplaced Pages-pages-and-validate-their-facts|title=How does Misplaced Pages's content review bot ClueBot NG review Misplaced Pages pages and validate their facts? - Quora|website=www.quora.com|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/bots-edit-wikipedia-humans-made/|title=The Bots Who Edit Misplaced Pages (And The Humans Who Made Them)|work=MakeUseOf|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref> The bot has proven indispensable because of its ability to find and correct false facts within seconds, but has irritated many editors whilst making an attempt to personalise an article.


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 05:33, 3 July 2017

This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (June 2017)
ClueBot NG
Original author(s)Christopher Breneman and Cobi Carter
Initial releaseDecember 3, 2010
Repository
Written inC, C++, PHP, Python, Bash, and Java
Websiteen.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ClueBot_NG Edit this on Wikidata

ClueBot NG is an internet bot used on the English Misplaced Pages that reverts edits to Misplaced Pages articles that it identifies as vandalism. Programmed and operated by two Misplaced Pages volunteer editors, it uses machine learning and Bayesian statistics to determine if an edit is vandalism.

History

The bot was created by Christopher Breneman and Cobi Carter in 2010. It shares very little in relationship to the original ClueBot, except its name and how they interface with Misplaced Pages. NG stands for Next Generation. Since its inception, it has made over three million edits. The allowable rate of mistakes is called the false positive rate. That rate is hand-set by administrators and is less than half a percent.

Criticism

Critics have stated that the bot bites new users, by not being able to apply a human brain's knowledge to the edit, and leaving impersonal templates which deter users from contributing in helpful ways. Some have called it "rubbish", and tried to have the bot shut down. The bot has proven indispensable because of its ability to find and correct false facts within seconds, but has irritated many editors whilst making an attempt to personalise an article.

See also

References

  1. Nasaw, Daniel (2012-07-25). "Meet the 'bots' that edit Misplaced Pages". BBC News.
  2. Raja, Sumit. "Little about the bot that runs Misplaced Pages, ClueBot NG". digitfreak.com. Retrieved 2017-04-11.
  3. "This machine kills trolls". The Verge. 2014-02-18. Retrieved 2017-04-11.
  4. "User talk:ClueBot Commons". Misplaced Pages. 2017-04-11.
  5. "User:ClueBot NG". Misplaced Pages. 2010-10-20.
  6. "Security Check Required". www.facebook.com. Retrieved 2017-04-11.
  7. "How does Misplaced Pages's content review bot ClueBot NG review Misplaced Pages pages and validate their facts? - Quora". www.quora.com. Retrieved 2017-04-11.
  8. "The Bots Who Edit Misplaced Pages (And The Humans Who Made Them)". MakeUseOf. Retrieved 2017-04-11.
Categories: