Revision as of 21:10, 7 August 2006 editKingbotk (talk | contribs)447,274 edits Tag with {{WPBiography}} for WP1.0 assessments, and remove {{Blp}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:19, 3 October 2006 edit undoMystar (talk | contribs)971 edits Please follow proper Wiki protocolsNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===The Emancipator's Wife=== | ===The Emancipator's Wife=== | ||
Hambly writes in the first sentence of the book's afterword, "''The Emancipator's Wife'' is a work of fiction", so I've taken the liberty of changing the category to "historical fiction". ] 00:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | Hambly writes in the first sentence of the book's afterword, "''The Emancipator's Wife'' is a work of fiction", so I've taken the liberty of changing the category to "historical fiction". ] 00:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
==Themes== | |||
Please understand using the proper syntax/ words is appropriate, even if you didn't place it. “Hambly has a penchant for genre-twisting characters” is an opinion of the person you are citing as a review, please note it is not a professional, nor peer review, but a reader review and again it is an opinion which makes the “ is said to have” not only appropriate but nessary, if you are going to keep the opinion and link. Secondly, “She also tends towards” in not proper grammar, and people do not use that syntax to speak. The fact that the reviewer thinks she offers up “rich descriptions and vivid characters is great, but improperly worded. SO I fixed it. Simply reverting my editing for the sake that it is not yours goes against Wiki policy. Please follow proper Wiki protocols. --] 19:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:19, 3 October 2006
Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
The Emancipator's Wife
Hambly writes in the first sentence of the book's afterword, "The Emancipator's Wife is a work of fiction", so I've taken the liberty of changing the category to "historical fiction". Cactus Wren 00:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Themes
Please understand using the proper syntax/ words is appropriate, even if you didn't place it. “Hambly has a penchant for genre-twisting characters” is an opinion of the person you are citing as a review, please note it is not a professional, nor peer review, but a reader review and again it is an opinion which makes the “ is said to have” not only appropriate but nessary, if you are going to keep the opinion and link. Secondly, “She also tends towards” in not proper grammar, and people do not use that syntax to speak. The fact that the reviewer thinks she offers up “rich descriptions and vivid characters is great, but improperly worded. SO I fixed it. Simply reverting my editing for the sake that it is not yours goes against Wiki policy. Please follow proper Wiki protocols. --Mystar 19:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Categories: