Revision as of 13:17, 10 May 2017 editXx236 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,481 edits →Types: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:59, 1 August 2017 edit undoInternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers5,381,138 edits Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.5beta)Next edit → | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
*Punitive | *Punitive | ||
] (]) 13:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC) | ] (]) 13:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
== External links modified == | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090303221407/http://www.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/rapport_gb_md_1.pdf to http://www.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/rapport_gb_md_1.pdf | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 20:59, 1 August 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:59, 1 August 2017
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Censorship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Social Media Censorship
Hi KTJeno, the social media censorship part that you added looks good. I added a bit about why seeing disgruntled citizens' comments about certain elected officials can be good for the government who is doing the censoring, as well as provide a link to the video. You could maybe add more about why social media censorship can be viewed as good or bad to improve your section further. Kellytaft.144 (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Dogma remains our greatest enemy, and leads to censorship. War is social cannibalism. In the universe of ideas let language be explosive and guns be silent!Tusk Bilasimo (talk) 11:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Internet censorship map colours
Substantial, selective and not classified/no data are too close in colour, even if the map is blown up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.240.78.187 (talk) 07:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Validity and Scientific Backing?
I've been told that one of the main drivers of censorship and modification of language is in the idea of Linguistic Relativity. Related would be the ideas of Linguistic determinism, Rebranding, Prototype Theory, and Cognitive Universalism. Anyone else think this might be a good/bad idea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.13.121.160 (talk) 03:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
photo correction
please reproduce again the photo because the black tables are bigger than they should be. Only third world censorship is that random. Some censorship officers were artists so the tables were exact, not bigger neither smaller than what it was needed. Misplaced Pages isn't a political newspaper. The fact you don't like censorship officers doesn't mean that they automatically become retarded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:410F:A900:BC5A:5B78:BB19:E344 (talk) 09:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Types
http://media.okstate.edu/faculty/jsenat/censorship/defining.htm
- Preventive (including Self=censorship)
- Punitive
Xx236 (talk) 13:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Censorship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090303221407/http://www.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/rapport_gb_md_1.pdf to http://www.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/rapport_gb_md_1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Freedom of speech articles
- High-importance Freedom of speech articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- Mid-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- C-Class law articles
- Top-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Top-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Pornography articles
- High-importance Pornography articles
- C-Class High-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles