| Revision as of 20:18, 3 October 2006 editCommodore Sloat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,928 edits Ritter mugshot nonsense← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:58, 3 October 2006 edit undoJango Davis (talk | contribs)425 edits →Ritter mugshot nonsenseNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Please stop the nonsense on the Ritter page. If you have something to contribute to the discussion please do so, but continually reverting the page after the discussion has been settled is immature and annoying. Please familiarize yourself with ]. Thanks.--] 20:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | Please stop the nonsense on the Ritter page. If you have something to contribute to the discussion please do so, but continually reverting the page after the discussion has been settled is immature and annoying. Please familiarize yourself with ]. Thanks.--] 20:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I am simply posting a mugshot, something that is a fact and of interest to anyone interested in Ritter's arrest. The only thing immature and annoying are the attempts to remove factual postings about about Ritter's attempt to sexually molest a teenager, which is not in doubt. I read nothing that prohibits the posting of a person's mugshot that is in the public arena. You have an interpetation about what is permissible to post that is incorrect. Ritter got himself arrested for being a pervert and you are going through extreme ends to water that fact down. Nothing speaks more to Ritter's arrest in that case that his mugshot. It is relevant and it will be posted. I am willing to compromise and post it only in the external link section. This is Ritter's problem, not yours, mine or Misplaced Pages's. If you wish, please feel free to explain the situation to a paid employee of Misplaced Pages and I will be pleased to listen to their input provided it comes with a verifiable Misplaced Pages employee name and Misplaced Pages e-mail address, otherwise, it is just another anonymous poster's opinion to which I attach no value to at all. -- 11:38 pm, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:58, 3 October 2006
First, welcome to Misplaced Pages. Second, could you add more external sources to the WAMC orAlan S. Chartock pages. I like to call a spade a spade, but I havn't been able to verify anything I've seen so far with multiple sources. Everything has come from Mr. Heller's website, and only having one source it seems to be heirsay --Zr2d2 02:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Zr2D2: Thank you for welcoming me to Wiki. I apologize if some of my comments appear directed towards any individual, when Alan is my issue. In response to your request for more external links to support the allegations, unfortunately, that is part of my problem for being an ex-WAMC employee and knowing the people involved. As I learned of this from the "victims" its not hearsay for me, but if I lay it all out, even anonymously as Wiki can provide, I'm afraid it would only result in good people getting fired or otherwise having the public eye cast apon them. The issue is really Alan and whether he used public donations to settle the charges out of court with the victim. What I could tell you over a beer and what I can say in a public forum are two different things. I understand and appreciate your fustration at the lack of publically reported information. I would doubt me too if I were in your shoes. I only ask everyone to consider why Alan hasn't sued Glen Heller yet for libel. -- Jango Davis
Ritter mugshot nonsense
Please stop the nonsense on the Ritter page. If you have something to contribute to the discussion please do so, but continually reverting the page after the discussion has been settled is immature and annoying. Please familiarize yourself with WP:BLP. Thanks.--csloat 20:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
I am simply posting a mugshot, something that is a fact and of interest to anyone interested in Ritter's arrest. The only thing immature and annoying are the attempts to remove factual postings about about Ritter's attempt to sexually molest a teenager, which is not in doubt. I read nothing that prohibits the posting of a person's mugshot that is in the public arena. You have an interpetation about what is permissible to post that is incorrect. Ritter got himself arrested for being a pervert and you are going through extreme ends to water that fact down. Nothing speaks more to Ritter's arrest in that case that his mugshot. It is relevant and it will be posted. I am willing to compromise and post it only in the external link section. This is Ritter's problem, not yours, mine or Misplaced Pages's. If you wish, please feel free to explain the situation to a paid employee of Misplaced Pages and I will be pleased to listen to their input provided it comes with a verifiable Misplaced Pages employee name and Misplaced Pages e-mail address, otherwise, it is just another anonymous poster's opinion to which I attach no value to at all. -- 11:38 pm, 3 October 2006 (UTC)