| Revision as of 05:19, 5 October 2006 editKinu (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators64,831 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:03, 5 October 2006 edit undoPStrait (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers1,611 edits sorry for my hostile toneNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Whats the deal? You keep reverting despite arguments I have made in discussion. This constitutes vandalism, I think. If you really disagree with my addition, make some arguments and we may need mediation. -] | Whats the deal? You keep reverting despite arguments I have made in discussion. This constitutes vandalism, I think. If you really disagree with my addition, make some arguments and we may need mediation. -] | ||
| *Sorry, didn't see the discussion... I merely picked up that repeated edits were being made while I was on ]. I have no vested interest in the page, so I'll let those who do discuss and act accordingly. And having been a Wikipedian for quite some time now, I am fully aware of the 3RR and had no intention of violating it. Thanks for the note. --<font face="Book Antiqua">] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></font> 05:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | *Sorry, didn't see the discussion... I merely picked up that repeated edits were being made while I was on ]. I have no vested interest in the page, so I'll let those who do discuss and act accordingly. And having been a Wikipedian for quite some time now, I am fully aware of the 3RR and had no intention of violating it. Thanks for the note. --<font face="Book Antiqua">] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></font> 05:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == sorry for my hostile tone == | |||
| Hi Kinu, | |||
| Sorry for my hostile tone-- I am new to wikipedia (in terms of editing, not reading) and am still learning about the ins and outs of how articles change. My only interest in this article is that I noticed that a long time ago a similar entry had been deleted for lack of qualified sourcing, and so I thought better sourcing would retain it, and I thought this issue in particular would be a good litmus test b/c its totally disgusting and I figured some people would object on those grounds and try to find excuses to delete. | |||
| PStrait | |||
Revision as of 06:03, 5 October 2006
 Archives |
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
Kinu -- stop reverting without discussing
Whats the deal? You keep reverting despite arguments I have made in discussion. This constitutes vandalism, I think. If you really disagree with my addition, make some arguments and we may need mediation. -PStrait
- Sorry, didn't see the discussion... I merely picked up that repeated edits were being made while I was on recent changes patrol. I have no vested interest in the page, so I'll let those who do discuss and act accordingly. And having been a Wikipedian for quite some time now, I am fully aware of the 3RR and had no intention of violating it. Thanks for the note. --Kinu /c 05:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
sorry for my hostile tone
Hi Kinu,
Sorry for my hostile tone-- I am new to wikipedia (in terms of editing, not reading) and am still learning about the ins and outs of how articles change. My only interest in this article is that I noticed that a long time ago a similar entry had been deleted for lack of qualified sourcing, and so I thought better sourcing would retain it, and I thought this issue in particular would be a good litmus test b/c its totally disgusting and I figured some people would object on those grounds and try to find excuses to delete.
PStrait