| Revision as of 00:50, 17 August 2017 view sourceIan.thomson (talk | contribs)58,562 edits →Stop.← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:30, 24 August 2017 view source Starke Hathaway (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,100 edits →Thanks for the thanks: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Stop excessively removing content from Wiki pages, notably the one about the ].<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small> | Stop excessively removing content from Wiki pages, notably the one about the ].<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small> | ||
| :{{ping|WikiHeathen}} Mark's given adequate reasons for removing the material he removed from the NRM article. You've provided no reasons for restoring said material. ] (]) 00:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC) | :{{ping|WikiHeathen}} Mark's given adequate reasons for removing the material he removed from the NRM article. You've provided no reasons for restoring said material. ] (]) 00:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == Thanks for the thanks == | |||
| As much as I appreciate it, though, I feel I must warn you that some could conceivably view your issuance of public thanks for edits to the Gamergate article as testing the limits of your Gamergate topic ban. ] (]) 13:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:30, 24 August 2017
A project which punishes editors for defending the good names and reputations of living people from vicious Internet trolls does not deserve to survive. A project which promotes and fosters racism and anti-Semitism is a menace to society.
.
Stop.
Stop excessively removing content from Wiki pages, notably the one about the Nordic Resistance Movement.— Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiHeathen (talk • contribs)
- @WikiHeathen: Mark's given adequate reasons for removing the material he removed from the NRM article. You've provided no reasons for restoring said material. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks
As much as I appreciate it, though, I feel I must warn you that some could conceivably view your issuance of public thanks for edits to the Gamergate article as testing the limits of your Gamergate topic ban. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 13:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)