| Revision as of 19:09, 5 October 2006 editByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 edits →Hello← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:05, 5 October 2006 edit undoByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 edits →HelloNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :No matter. I don't think there is much more that can be said on the matter: an orthomodular lattice is just that, really. ] 19:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | :No matter. I don't think there is much more that can be said on the matter: an orthomodular lattice is just that, really. ] 19:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::Mail sent. ] 20:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:05, 5 October 2006
Welcome!
Hello, InXistant, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Melchoir 20:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello
Your change to relational quantum mechanics inspired me to create a stub for orthomodular lattices, since they're so important to quantum logic, and the red link is ugly. I can't be bothered to add to it now (and there's not much else to say, really), but you might have a couple of things to put there...
I'm very happy to see someone doing articles on categorical approaches to QM foundations et al! Byrgenwulf 18:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- No matter. I don't think there is much more that can be said on the matter: an orthomodular lattice is just that, really. Byrgenwulf 19:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Mail sent. Byrgenwulf 20:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)