| Revision as of 05:12, 1 October 2006 editAzer Red (talk | contribs)1,453 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:11, 5 October 2006 edit undoPeregrine Fisher (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,209 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| PS: Also, your test worked, and your edits to ] were reverted. | PS: Also, your test worked, and your edits to ] were reverted. | ||
| :It wasn't a test. I thought that that statement had too much of a POV intent.--] ] 05:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC) | :It wasn't a test. I thought that that statement had too much of a POV intent.--] ] 05:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Alignment== | |||
| How about adjusting it and adding the cite template instead of removing the Criticism section? - ] 21:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:11, 5 October 2006
Welcome!
Hello, Rouge Rosado, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
bibliomaniac15 02:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)'
PS: Also, your test worked, and your edits to Misplaced Pages:CVU were reverted.
- It wasn't a test. I thought that that statement had too much of a POV intent.--Rouge Rosado Oui? 05:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Alignment
How about adjusting it and adding the cite template instead of removing the Criticism section? - Peregrinefisher 21:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)