Revision as of 16:29, 4 October 2006 editThe Singing Badger (talk | contribs)11,395 edits matus← Previous edit |
Revision as of 22:15, 5 October 2006 edit undoThe Singing Badger (talk | contribs)11,395 edits clarificationNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
#A section providing a rebutal of the anti-Stratfordian arguments is needed to balance out the article and address POV concerns. |
|
#A section providing a rebutal of the anti-Stratfordian arguments is needed to balance out the article and address POV concerns. |
|
#'''Citations''' are needed for many of the claimed orthodox perspectives, many of which use ]s such as 'the orthodox perspective is...'. Quotable sources include Sam Schoenbaum's ''Shakespeare's Lives'' and ''Shakespeare: A Documentary Life'', Jonathan Bate's ''The Genius of Shakespeare'', Park Honan's ''Shakespeare: a Life'', Irvin Leigh Matus's ''Shakespeare in Fact'' and . |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the claimed orthodox perspectives''', many of which use ]s such as 'the orthodox perspective is...'. Quotable sources include Sam Schoenbaum's ''Shakespeare's Lives'' and ''Shakespeare: A Documentary Life'', Jonathan Bate's ''The Genius of Shakespeare'', Park Honan's ''Shakespeare: a Life'', Irvin Leigh Matus's ''Shakespeare in Fact'' and . |
|
#'''Citations''' are needed for many of the anti-Stratfordian arguments. Ideally, these citations should be to the 'classic' texts in the field, in order to avoid giving undue weight to not-yet established or minority anti-Stratfordian theories: this too would follow . |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the anti-Stratfordian arguments'''. Any properly published (see below) anti-Stratfordian text is acceptable. Avoid giving undue weight to not-yet established or minority theories: this too would follow . |
|
#In accordance with the previous point, all ideas that are only supported by references to '''self-published books''' or '''websites by non-experts in theatre history''' need to be weeded out (not because they're necessarily wrong, but because is to avoid citations to such texts). |
|
#In accordance with the previous point, all ideas that are only supported by references to '''self-published books''' or '''websites by non-experts in theatre history''' need to be weeded out (not because they're necessarily wrong, but because is to avoid citations to such texts). |
|
#Many '''typical anti-Stratfordian arguments''' are still missing, ''e.g.'' the claim that Shakespeare was not eulogized when he died. |
|
#Many '''typical anti-Stratfordian arguments''' are still missing, ''e.g.'' the claim that Shakespeare was not eulogized when he died. |