Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:28, 6 October 2006 editByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 14:32, 6 October 2006 edit undoByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 edits []Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}} {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}
This is a ]-ridden "]". It has not been published in any ] &mdash; both journals from which the article is sourced are decidedly cranky (''Medical Hypotheses'' particularly: they will publish anything, quite literally, as long as the author pays per page). It also fails ] policies, since no real assertion of notability is made. And it arguably is ] as well. Moreover, Misplaced Pages does not need to be a platform for the promotion of utterly misleading drivel. ] 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC) This is a ]-ridden "]". It has not been published in any ] &mdash; both journals from which the article is sourced are decidedly cranky (''Medical Hypotheses'' particularly: they will publish anything, quite literally, as long as the author pays per page). It also fails ] policies, since no real assertion of notability is made. And it arguably is ] as well. Moreover, Misplaced Pages does not need to be a platform for the promotion of utterly misleading drivel.
Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.] 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:32, 6 October 2006

Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory

This is a bollocks-ridden "fringe theory". It has not been published in any reliable sources — both journals from which the article is sourced are decidedly cranky (Medical Hypotheses particularly: they will publish anything, quite literally, as long as the author pays per page). It also fails notability policies, since no real assertion of notability is made. And it arguably is original research as well. Moreover, Misplaced Pages does not need to be a platform for the promotion of utterly misleading drivel. Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.Byrgenwulf 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Categories: