| Revision as of 17:40, 6 October 2006 editAnville (talk | contribs)6,887 editsm →[]: minor format tweak← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:49, 6 October 2006 edit undoByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 edits →[]: linking to Hu's deletion nominationNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.] 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.] 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| '''Update''' The creator's apparent vanity piece has also been nominated for deletion, ]. ] 17:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' as a violation of all the policies mentioned in the nomination. I suspect this article violates ] as well: it was created by an IP, {{user|24.185.23.19}}, who also edited ] last April. According to ] (the article on the inventor of this "theory"), Hu attended that school in the 1990s. ] 17:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as a violation of all the policies mentioned in the nomination. I suspect this article violates ] as well: it was created by an IP, {{user|24.185.23.19}}, who also edited ] last April. According to ] (the article on the inventor of this "theory"), Hu attended that school in the 1990s. ] 17:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:49, 6 October 2006
Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory
This is a bollocks-ridden "fringe theory". It has not been published in any reliable sources — both journals from which the article is sourced are decidedly cranky (Medical Hypotheses particularly: they will publish anything, quite literally, as long as the author pays per page ). It also fails notability policies, since no real assertion of notability is made. And it arguably is original research as well. Moreover, Misplaced Pages does not need to be a platform for the promotion of utterly misleading drivel.
Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.Byrgenwulf 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Update The creator's apparent vanity piece has also been nominated for deletion, here. Byrgenwulf 17:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as a violation of all the policies mentioned in the nomination. I suspect this article violates WP:VAIN as well: it was created by an IP, 24.185.23.19 (talk · contribs), who also edited New York Law School last April. According to Huping Hu (the article on the inventor of this "theory"), Hu attended that school in the 1990s. Anville 17:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)