| Revision as of 15:46, 28 June 2006 editSilence (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,687 edits clarifying refs entry: the article still needs more refs, particularly ones cited at points within the text, so we can determine which statements are backed up← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:31, 7 October 2006 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,395 edits UpdateNext edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
* Resolve the instances where sections of the article have been tagged. |
|
|
* Resolve the situation that currently the into mentions Hinduism, but the rest of the article is exclusively about the Abrahamic tradition, apart from a sentence that lacks a reference. Hindu creationists believe the world is older not younger and don't believe in separate human creation. |
|
|
* Review whether other religions apart from those of the Abrahamic tradition and Hinduism should be mentioned. At the moment the intro says "in theory" which isn't very encyclopedic. Possible religions to be mentioned could include ], which is similar to the Abrahamic religions. Also tradional religions could be mentioned. |
|
* Add section on the differences/similarities/conflict between Intelligent Design and Creationism |
|
* Add section on the differences/similarities/conflict between Intelligent Design and Creationism |
|
⚫ |
* "Keep" the article NPOV. |
|
* Add inline references to improve verifiability. |
|
|
* Re-visit the suggestion that "Creationism" refers to any and all theories that the universe was created ex nihilo by a deity, as opposed, more specifically, to the assertion that it was created in six twenty-four hour days, literally and as to every detail as described in Genesis 1. See ]. |
|
| ⚫ |
* Keep the article NPOV. |
|