Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:08, 7 October 2006 editByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 editsm Candidate pages: moving Asmodeus: has met threshold← Previous edit Revision as of 18:09, 7 October 2006 edit undoByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 edits Approved pages: placing AsmodeusNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:
===Approved pages=== ===Approved pages===
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top. These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

; ]
: This user has ongoing problems with being civil and not bullying other editors, as well as possible long-term abuse of Misplaced Pages as a ] 17:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)


;] ;]

Revision as of 18:09, 7 October 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

This process is for discussing specific users who have violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in Article content disputes.

Uncertified user RfCs

Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#User-conduct RfC for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

Closing and archiving

Disputes may be removed from this page and archived under any of the following circumstances:

  1. If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
  2. The parties to the dispute agree.
  3. The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.

Remove the link from the list here and add it to the archives at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.

General user conduct

Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:

Example user
{one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~ (note: that is five tildes, not four, RFCs are signed with the date only, not your username)


Candidate pages

These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

Donotsayno
Will not respond to talk page entries and makes nonsensical edits to TV station articles. --CFIF 20:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Approved pages

These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

Asmodeus
This user has ongoing problems with being civil and not bullying other editors, as well as possible long-term abuse of Misplaced Pages as a soapbox 17:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Lordkazan
Regarding Lordkazan's poor conduct when in disputes with other users. JBKramer 21:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Safelibraries.org
Regarding Safelibraries' persistent violations of NPOV, RS, "Not a soapbox", etc 22:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
POnju
The dispute is over the behavior by POnju such as lack of civility, repeatedly editing an article about himself, and personal attacks. 19:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Daniel575
The dispute centres around behavior by Daniel575 such as lack of civility and personal attacks. 15:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Uknewthat
This user is engaged in an edit war to advance a point of view at Global Positioning System and Hafele-Keating experiment and does not seem interested in reaching concensus or communicating with other users. 22:42, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Glengordon01
Persistent refusal to satisfy WP:V, WP:NOR, and WP:CIVIL at Charun, a page which has been edit protected since August 25. Rejects input from impartial third parties. 01:24, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Devin79

Constant reverting, POV pushing and personal attacks on Provisional Irish Republican Army and related pages. Such behaviour going on for about a year now. 11:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Tatsuma
Tatsuma jumped into the middle of a content dispute about criticism in the Ars Technica article and began reverting the article during a mediation request to force his POV against any consensus. He continued the reverts after mediation ended. New information has come to light on the user in the RfC. 15:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
El Gringo
Repeated personal attacks on pages related to the United Kingdom and Ireland have long gone unchecked. Now user is being warned, he or she has repeatedly removed warnings labeling them as 'vandalism'. 18:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Myspaceaddictaust
repeated reversion of article MySpace (as a dynamic IP until recently), breaking 3rr several times. Led to protection of page. Makes experienced editors discuss any changes with him before approval, even though he's three days old. Basically, everything in WP:OWN. 13:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Kmaguir1
Aggressive POV editing, ignoring WP:CONSENSUS at bell hooks and elsewhere19:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Pravknight
Aggressive POV editing and apparent article ownership of Paul Weyrich. Aggressive POV editing of Dominionism-related articles. 04:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Rod Ball
WP:NOR, exhausting the patience of physicist editors by failing to acknowledge the results of textbook level special relativity. 15:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Elk Salmon
Repeated edit warring at Moscow Metro, coupled with a refusal to cooperate and negotiate with other editors attempting to resolve the dispute at the article. 23:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Carfiend
JR Pietri
  • Repeated violation of WP:SPAM, ongoing edit war over the spam material. 00:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Supreme Cmdr
Edit warring and consensus issues at Derek Smart. 00:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Ferick
Violations of WP:3RR, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:NPA, WP:CON, WP:V, WP:RS etc. 03:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Snake Liquid
Civility, personal attacks, self-user talk blanking. 05:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
MatthewFenton
argues for blocks as punishment. The manner or tone of this argument has been described as problematic. 19:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
203.54.*.*
Unable to accept implications of no original research and verifiability policies, attacks on other users, poor civility and etiquette on talk pages 01:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Darwinek
Violations of WP:MoS WP:CIVIL WP:NPA WP:VANDAL WP:HA
Insert-Belltower
Violations, WP:CIVIL, WP:SOCK 21:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
UCRGrad
Violations of WP:OWN, WP:SOCK, WP:Civility, WP:NPA, WP:NLT 15:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Francespeabody
Continued personal attacks and allegations of racism and censorship. Violations of WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:3RR, and WP:V 04:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Wiarthurhu
Violations of WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:OR, WP:NP, WP:CIVIL, WP:POINT, WP:OWN 15:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Sheynhertz-Unbayg
Refusal to participate in mediation, personal attacks, reversion of constructive edits. 01:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Telex
Telex has been engaging in edit wars removing repeatedly a dispute tag although the dispute has not been settled.--06:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Gibnews
Aggressive POV editing and apparent article ownership on Gibraltar-related articles. 20:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
F.O.E.
WP:BITE, WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL... 00:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Rjensen
Repeated personal attack, now up to a half-dozen times. 02:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Teemu Ruskeepää
User:Teemu Ruskeepää Has been continually attempting to restructure the talk page of Fidel Castro, and is now adding a lengthy poll to the foot of each talk discussion, despite many comments that he does not have consensus. Furthermore, responses to the many other users who object to this have become increasingly uncivil and accusatory. 10:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
JD_UK
JD_UK argues about any changes I make to any articles. I have heard that he doesn't accept things, even though he admits they're good, because I did it. He constantly argues all the time with me, and it's causing unneeded wikistress. He has often demanded I stay off his talkpage, and made personal attacks towards me.
Michaellovesnyc
User:Michaellovesnyc has been violating multiple Misplaced Pages policies in his attempt to push his point of view, primarily on Mail-order bride. 22:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Irpen
Irpen has been engaging in removing repeatedly a dispute tag altough the dispute was not settled. He refused to follow WP:DR, misinterpreted WP:Consensus, was adding misleading edit summaries and comments.--05:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Imacomp
Imacomp has been engaging in uncivil behavior, including blatantly misleading edit summaries, repeated personal attacks, edit warring, and blanket reverts of edits to edits made by editors that he "trusts". 16:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Brya
User:Brya has made a series of controversial edits to pages in biology (specifically botany), reverting changes made. Discussion and informal mediation has been attempted on his talk.09:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Mines45
Mines45 has repeatedly made controversial edits to a small number of pages, and has continually reinstated these edits in the face of factual evidence to the contrary. In over seven months of editing, he/she has yet to use a single edit summary, or respond to a single discussion page posting. In fact, all posts made on Mines45's talk page are quickly removed. In addition, he/she has made two personal attacks on a Misplaced Pages administrator. 19:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Frater FiatLux
A member of Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (Rosicrucian Order of A+O), this user came to Misplaced Pages to intentionally wage a propaganda battle against all other Golden Dawn orders. He has done this through edit warring, revert warring, recruitment of meatpuppets to support him in revert warring, and continued edit warring after signing an agreement to mediation. He has exhausted the patience of all other editors of the articles he has been attacking. This is a requeset for a community ban. 17:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Michael D. Wolok
Allegations against Wolok of continually disregards content policies, behavior policies, engages in spamming campaigns, exhausts community patience 14:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
maddyfan
Edit warred the Christina Aguilera article causing it to be protected, incivility, personal attacks and sockpuppetry. 22:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Swainstonation
Uncivil behavior on own and others' talk pages. 05:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Dr1819
Incivility and personal attacks centered on men's fashion articles 01:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Hatto
Extremely uncooperative user; vandalism, reverts, copywrite problems, non-communication, disruption, edit warring, NPOV, disregard for policy, more. 03:26, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Rick Norwood
Consistent addition of loaded and POV paragraphs and sections in the Conservatism article. 15:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Tony Sidaway (3)
Discussion with regards to the editing of user signatures 05:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
SNIyer12
User constantly adds innacurate/unsourced information to articles and ignores requests that s/he stop. 00:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example admin
Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Candidate pages

These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

Approved pages

These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

FCYTravis
Administrator FCYTravis has been uncivil, abused his status as an administrator by engaging in edit wars, reverting protected pages, and setting a poor example by being uncivil to editors and abusing Misplaced Pages policy to suit his interpretations. 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Discretion blocks by admins
RfC based on blocks issued by administrators: Dmcdevit and Blnguyen 31 August 2006