| Revision as of 02:31, 8 October 2006 editShotwell (talk | contribs)3,697 edits →[] merge proposal: reponse is on your talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:21, 8 October 2006 edit undoTompw (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,094 edits Importance of Functional AnalysisNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| Are there any other college newspapers which have pages, if not I would support a merge and redirect. ] 21:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC) | Are there any other college newspapers which have pages, if not I would support a merge and redirect. ] 21:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I have responded on your talk page. ] 02:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | :I have responded on your talk page. ] 02:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Importance of Functional Analysis == | |||
| Sure, no problem. The importance ratings I give I only ever intended to be initial ones. Inevitably, the importance reflects my own mathematical knowledge and experience. In some areas (such as analysis or number theory), this is likely to lead to someone more familiar with the area coming along and correcting the results of my ignorance. I never mind people correcting my ratings, providing they give a good reason (like you did). :-) ] 11:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:21, 8 October 2006
WikiProject Wikify Alert: Check out the backlog cleanup taskforceThe Ashes of Eden
Nicely done! I think you could go ahead and remove the cleanup tag. EdJohnston 15:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Now I am one step closer to fitting in at a Star Trek convention. shotwell 15:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
System Accident
Sounds good. I will review and vote later.Dudeman1st 05:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
'WARNING'
Please assume good faith and stop engaging in personal attacks and wp:uncivil behavior. Furthermore do not begin an edit war. All changes in Advocates for Children in Therapy should be listed on the talk page for discussion and comment and consensus building. The article as is represents a previously built consensus among divergent opinions. I have not added a warning message here, but if your behavior continues I will be foreced to do so. MarkWood 14:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Personal attacks? What are you on about? shotwell 15:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Grading mathematics articles
First up, thanks for your contributions in grading mathematics articles. Could I request that you record the results of your work in the relevant section of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Mathematics/Wikipedia_1.0? That way it prevents other editors from duplicating your efforts.
Many thanks, Tompw 14:41, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- On the above page, you'll see a navigation box, which has links to the dozen or so "Assessment pages". These each cover some major division of mathemetics. When grading an article, decide which area it belongs to. (Some articles could go under several categories... just pick the one you think is best). Go to the assessment page, use the example {{maths rating}} template at the top on the talk page of the article your grading. Then edit the "Assessment pages" to include the article you've just graded. Use other articles' entries to help you with wikicode etc.. Make sure you inlucde any comment you left. Hope this helps. Tompw 15:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Always happy to help :-) Tompw 15:54, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
The Collegian (Walla Walla College) merge proposal
Are there any other college newspapers which have pages, if not I would support a merge and redirect. Ansell 21:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- I have responded on your talk page. shotwell 02:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Importance of Functional Analysis
Sure, no problem. The importance ratings I give I only ever intended to be initial ones. Inevitably, the importance reflects my own mathematical knowledge and experience. In some areas (such as analysis or number theory), this is likely to lead to someone more familiar with the area coming along and correcting the results of my ignorance. I never mind people correcting my ratings, providing they give a good reason (like you did). :-) Tompw 11:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)