| Revision as of 23:56, 22 September 2017 editChris troutman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers54,800 edits OneClickArchiver archived 1 discussion to User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive 20← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:56, 22 September 2017 edit undoChris troutman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers54,800 edits OneClickArchiver archived 1 discussion to User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive 20Next edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| And there is also ] | And there is also ] | ||
| ==Warning2== | |||
| ]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Repeated ] can result in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> | |||
| == Forrester Research == | == Forrester Research == | ||
Revision as of 23:56, 22 September 2017
The ArbCom as currently constructed and staffed has amply demonstrated that not only is it incapable of accomplishing the sole task for which it was established (To provide resolution to disputes that the community has been unable to resolve), it has become the locus from which disruption emanates. Vote NO on every candidate to prevent further validation of this farce.
HURRY, HURRY, HURRY!
Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!
The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.
The most ethical show in the big top!
| This is TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive
Forrester Research
I see you removed a reference to Forrester Research. Isn't it encyclopedic?NSpehler (talk) 2:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Poor ref on DeD
Pen, i clearly understood your point i always have, that's why i never interrupt on the edits of other editors you undid. But in my case i am confident that my content is true and authentic, and is written in a way it should be written. And your concern with the sources, i am removing as less important references as i can. I already deleted refrences that were twice used or according to you is not ok. Tell me you remove my critical reception part, where as strong sources were presented such as Dawn News and Aaaj News, in rating section i used official and authentic Broadcasters' Audience Research Board references and BizAsia an Indian online rating channel for UKs programming. Tell me are these invalid or Crap sources?.
I am not user Sammy.joseph who is new to Misplaced Pages, i have made series of an article and they are believed to be good and never question. In Pakistan Television Industry media sources are very few who are acclaimed but that doesn't mean they are crap. No matter how much you referred me to Misplaced Pages policies or rules, i know them very well. I am asking you to believe in my edits and i will try to clean as much CRAP as possible and actually i always have. Fushan007 9:244, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
why did you delete image
it said you deleted an image from the page harley huke for copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lux44-musicpages (talk • contribs)