Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:47, 27 September 2017

Battle of Hawijah

September 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Cross-article disruption. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi there,

@LouisAragon: I don't have any content dispute with anyone. If you have any problem with any of my edit, revert them. I really don't care. I edit sometime just for timepass. I created some articles like Fiske Guide to Colleges and Battle of Hawijah. Some editors wanted to delete them, I let them do it, but they were not deleted . I don't have any content dispute, or any dispute with anyone. Thanks and best regards,--Psychonot (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Template:Nuclear power in Iran

I have reverted your edit to Template:Nuclear power in Iran where you added Khamenei's name to the section 'Iranian nuclear negotiators'. Khamenei is not a 'nuclear negotiator' involved in negotiations, unless you can provide some WP:RS stating such. DA1 (talk) 19:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

@DA1: Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei issued a letter of guidelines to President Rouhani, on how to proceed with the deal. The new conditions set by him nullifed the original agreement I thought that makes him involved as a negotiator.

That does not make him a negotiator, just as a lecture or command is not a debate. You need to be involved 'in' formal negotiations to be a nuclear negotiator, which he is not. DA1 (talk) 02:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for following up on this!--Psychonot (talk) 18:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Stop removing sourced material

Please stop removing sourced materials from the articles. --Mhhossein 14:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.★Trekker (talk) 21:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

His involvement now has a source. Next time don't waste people's time removing information which is known to be true because it has a lacking citation, find a better one.★Trekker (talk) 21:43, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Psychonot, please don't remove reports by others from WP:AIV. If the report isn't valid it will be declined anyway. EdJohnston (talk) 22:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

EdJohnston: Among other warnings, he has already received mine for removing the well sourced materials. --Mhhossein 07:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)