| Revision as of 13:43, 9 October 2006 editCounter-revolutionary (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users7,784 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:44, 9 October 2006 edit undoSandyDancer (talk | contribs)3,486 edits →[] - Crown Prince?Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Did you look here...].? You will find it supports what I have said.--] 13:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | Did you look here...].? You will find it supports what I have said.--] 13:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| As far as I can see it simply doesn't support what you have said. Can you actually explain, specifically, how it supports your view? --] 14:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:44, 9 October 2006
Advice on royalty pages: Misplaced Pages follows a strict formula for royal pages, in terms of content, layout and naming. The basic rules are:
- All monarchs and royal families are named using their highest ranking title; for example, King Edward VIII, not the Duke of Windsor.
- Styles are not used in articles; instead, a style box is always used.
- The image goes on the top-right hand side of all pages.
- For past monarchs and their children, the royal house template is used.
- For current monarchs and their descendants, the royal family template is used.
- Both templates are never used together.
- Because many articles are quite small, with the text sometimes smaller than one template, the royal house template for both houses is not used. Instead only the template of the senior parent (ie, whichever was the monarch, not the consort) is used.
- A royal consort has the template of the royal family they marry into, not of the family they were born into, on their page. However once they die, their birth family template replaces the marital royal family template.
With thousands of articles on royalty, and hundreds of contributors to them, the same standard format needs to be used across each article. Any inadvertent content, layout or naming that does not match that format is deleted to restore the article to the agreed format. For full details on royal naming rules, see Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (names and titles).
Any changes that do not follow the Naming Conventions are automatically reverted on sight. FearÉIREANN
\ 23:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
I apologise. But so much stuff that broke the MoS and NC rules had been added in that I had to revert to the last page compliant with the MoS and NC. That is standard, unfortunately, when so much POV and MoS-breaking stuff is added. Please do add in information. Just be careful to source it and write it in an NPOV way. WP's job is neither to be pro- or anti- Leka, republicans or monarchists. Edits that appear to push one side fall foul of NPOV. FearÉIREANN
\ 19:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Vittorio Emanuele - Crown Prince?
I disagree with how you have interpreted the guidelines above on this page, please see Talk:Vittorio_Emanuele,_Prince_of_Naples and respond there if wish to progress this. Also, I don't know where the guidelines above come from and whether they are valid and binding (as far as any rule or guideline on Misplaced Pages can be binding, that is). --SandyDancer 13:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Did you look here...Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (names and titles).? You will find it supports what I have said.--Couter-revolutionary 13:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
As far as I can see it simply doesn't support what you have said. Can you actually explain, specifically, how it supports your view? --SandyDancer 14:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)