| Revision as of 22:39, 9 October 2006 editLocalzuk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,866 edits →Please read our policies: revert war warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:41, 9 October 2006 edit undo66.93.144.171 (talk) →Please read our policiesNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| ::Please read what I said! I said that ''third party analyses of the subject have to be presented as citations'' else an analysis by an individual is simply original research. You are editing disruptively and it is liable to be blocked. | ::Please read what I said! I said that ''third party analyses of the subject have to be presented as citations'' else an analysis by an individual is simply original research. You are editing disruptively and it is liable to be blocked. | ||
| ::Also, as I said - there are several established editors ''removing'' the content. And many anonymous editors adding trivial and irrlevant nonsense to the article.-]<sup>]</sup> 22:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | ::Also, as I said - there are several established editors ''removing'' the content. And many anonymous editors adding trivial and irrlevant nonsense to the article.-]<sup>]</sup> 22:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::YOU read what I said. Simple observations of a first party source are not OR. OR is if I cite myself saying South Park was made by space frogs and use Misplaced Pages to advance that theory. Most of the editors fighting to keep the content are NOT anonymous but are trying to make it better. You are simply going in, seeing content that YOU think is trivial and unilaterally removing it using OR as a transparent excuse. If you think I am in the wrong, call in arbitration. But YOU are the disruptive editor, attempting to gut an article to conform to your standards at the expense of the community. I am trying to protect the work done by the majority because there is NO GOOD REASON to delete it. - ] 22:41, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Please stop! Post your reasons why this information should be included despite our policies on the matter.-]<sup>]</sup> 22:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | :::Please stop! Post your reasons why this information should be included despite our policies on the matter.-]<sup>]</sup> 22:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::::YOU stop. YOU post your reasons. The policies are NOT in violation. Your understanding of ] is significantly flawed. | |||
| So I can get it out of the way as you are on your second revert: | So I can get it out of the way as you are on your second revert: | ||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR -->-]<sup>]</sup> 22:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR -->-]<sup>]</sup> 22:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I am well aware of the 3RR rule. Thank you. | |||
Revision as of 22:41, 9 October 2006
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions.
Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Misplaced Pages to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 66.93.144.171). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.
When you edit pages:
- Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
- Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Misplaced Pages policy.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.
The Misplaced Pages Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Misplaced Pages. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Pixelface 04:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that, one of my blind days. Mapletip 05:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- No prob. :) - 66.93.144.171 05:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Please read our policies
Hi, regarding Make Love, Not Warcraft. I urge you to go and read our policies on citations, reliable sources, verifiability and original research: WP:CITE, WP:RS, WP:CITE and WP:OR.
Just because your analysis of something in a show seems obvious it does not mean it is true. Unless you can find a third party independant source then it is simply not acceptable as material on the site.-Localzuk 22:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Also note that there are at least 2 other, established, editors who are removing original research and not just I. Please discuss this on the articles talk page. Also note that sheer volume of people trying to include original research does not give it any more weight as it is against policy.-Localzuk 22:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- You yourself note that there have been far more established editors trying to keep the material exactly where it is. YOU are the one who should have gone to the talk page. It is NOT OR, and continuing to blank content is vandalism. - 66.93.144.171 22:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please read what I said! I said that third party analyses of the subject have to be presented as citations else an analysis by an individual is simply original research. You are editing disruptively and it is liable to be blocked.
- Also, as I said - there are several established editors removing the content. And many anonymous editors adding trivial and irrlevant nonsense to the article.-Localzuk 22:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- YOU read what I said. Simple observations of a first party source are not OR. OR is if I cite myself saying South Park was made by space frogs and use Misplaced Pages to advance that theory. Most of the editors fighting to keep the content are NOT anonymous but are trying to make it better. You are simply going in, seeing content that YOU think is trivial and unilaterally removing it using OR as a transparent excuse. If you think I am in the wrong, call in arbitration. But YOU are the disruptive editor, attempting to gut an article to conform to your standards at the expense of the community. I am trying to protect the work done by the majority because there is NO GOOD REASON to delete it. - 66.93.144.171 22:41, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop! Post your reasons why this information should be included despite our policies on the matter.-Localzuk 22:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- YOU stop. YOU post your reasons. The policies are NOT in violation. Your understanding of WP:OR is significantly flawed.
- Please stop! Post your reasons why this information should be included despite our policies on the matter.-Localzuk 22:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
So I can get it out of the way as you are on your second revert: Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.-Localzuk 22:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- I am well aware of the 3RR rule. Thank you.