Revision as of 19:52, 9 October 2006 editThryduulf (talk | contribs)Oversighters, Administrators98,883 edits →[]: discussion concluded: deletion endorsed← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:44, 9 October 2006 edit undoThryduulf (talk | contribs)Oversighters, Administrators98,883 edits →[]: discussion concluded. Deletion endorsedNext edit → |
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
|
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page. |
|
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page. |
|
--> |
|
--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
|
|
|
This was deleted because i had already made a page about it a while ago. It was deleted then because no information was found through a google search or anything for it and it didn't have any information about it on the internet at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
Now however, the program is a few vesrions on and has its own website at www.huckool.com/iggy (not sure if google is listing it yet but it is there). |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not advertising because the program is a completely free, harmless, adfree download which means there's apsolutely nothing in it for me (the owner). |
|
|
|
|
|
The page for it was at "Iggy (Program)" |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. {{unsigned|Ahpro}} |
|
|
|
|
|
* Note the discussion in question is ] ] 20:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Keep deleted'''. Independent third-party coverage is needed for the program to be considered notable, and to justify overturning the AfD. Self-published sources are not sufficient. --]<sup>]</sup> 21:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Keep deleted'''. DRV is about process, not content, and the nom is merely asking for the article to be put back because things have changed on his end; that's not a process argument. ] is of course free to create a new ] article whenever he wants as long as it's somehow different (preferably quite a bit different) from the version that was deleted. Of course, if other editors believe the new article isn't somehow different, or otherwise suffers from the same problem(s) that got it brought up on an AfD in the first place, it will probably be ]. (Note to Ahpro: Please take this advice to heart; until your program achieves some sort of notability - like a review in a major computer magazine or something - any recreation of the Iggy article will probably get killed off again.) --] 00:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse deletion''' per Sam - ''third-party'' sources are needed. <font face="sans-serif">''']]]'''</font> 00:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC) <small>(edit conflict, yet to read Aaron's, so I can't say "per Aaron" yet.)</small> |
|