| Revision as of 20:15, 15 August 2017 editJerm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,667 editsm Reverted edits by JudeccaXIII (talk) to last version by 208.54.5.210← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:03, 18 October 2017 edit undoOshwah (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators496,871 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Leif Erikson Day. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Furthermore, if you believe this person is notable enough to be listed on the page, I would caution you to be more careful in restoring the entry. In removing that entry, I added another - an actress & contortionist who has been active since at least 1990 and has an article on Misplaced Pages. But when you wholesale reverted my edit, you not only restored the non-notable personality but removed the one who {{em|is}} notable, as I did both things in the same edit. Dispute the one I removed if you must, but please be careful to keep the other one out of this - the notability of Bonnie is not in dispute. <font color="gray">'''Zeke'''</font>, the '''Mad <font color="blue">Horrorist</font>''' <small><sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub></small> 00:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC) | Furthermore, if you believe this person is notable enough to be listed on the page, I would caution you to be more careful in restoring the entry. In removing that entry, I added another - an actress & contortionist who has been active since at least 1990 and has an article on Misplaced Pages. But when you wholesale reverted my edit, you not only restored the non-notable personality but removed the one who {{em|is}} notable, as I did both things in the same edit. Dispute the one I removed if you must, but please be careful to keep the other one out of this - the notability of Bonnie is not in dispute. <font color="gray">'''Zeke'''</font>, the '''Mad <font color="blue">Horrorist</font>''' <small><sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub></small> 00:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == October 2017 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 20:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself or ] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 20:03, 18 October 2017
 Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! This IP address, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
November 2015
Hello, I'm Amortias. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jimmy Graham, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 18:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Morgan (surname)
I removed the entry on this insurance agent because there is no evidence given that we should care enough about such a person to include him on the page. What has this person done other than being an insurance agent for AAA? If no answer can be given to that question, then we should leave the entry off the list. Misplaced Pages does not, and cannot, hope to list every single person with a certain name.
Furthermore, if you believe this person is notable enough to be listed on the page, I would caution you to be more careful in restoring the entry. In removing that entry, I added another - an actress & contortionist who has been active since at least 1990 and has an article on Misplaced Pages. But when you wholesale reverted my edit, you not only restored the non-notable personality but removed the one who is notable, as I did both things in the same edit. Dispute the one I removed if you must, but please be careful to keep the other one out of this - the notability of Bonnie is not in dispute. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Follow my trail) 00:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
October 2017
Your recent editing history at Leif Erikson Day shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~ 20:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.