Revision as of 06:36, 3 October 2006 editRalbot (talk | contribs)57,708 edits Signpost delivery using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:09, 10 October 2006 edit undoRalbot (talk | contribs)57,708 edits Signpost delivery using AWBNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* ''… marked decrease in tolerance … I am no longer sure I know what consensus is, nor that I can trust the ArbCom and the bureaucrats to do the "right" thing. … it now seems to be a blockable offence to fully and frankly (but civilly) exchange views, or to disagree with certain admins, particularly if that disagreement is expressed in forceful (but civil) terms, and that the rules seem to change when it suits the people making the rules.'' , | * ''… marked decrease in tolerance … I am no longer sure I know what consensus is, nor that I can trust the ArbCom and the bureaucrats to do the "right" thing. … it now seems to be a blockable offence to fully and frankly (but civilly) exchange views, or to disagree with certain admins, particularly if that disagreement is expressed in forceful (but civil) terms, and that the rules seem to change when it suits the people making the rules.'' , | ||
I encourage everyone to use my page for a constructive conversation concerning the above, and the current state of affairs on our 'pedia. I'll check back in a month. Regards all. ] ] 17:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | I encourage everyone to use my page for a constructive conversation concerning the above, and the current state of affairs on our 'pedia. I'll check back in a month. Regards all. ] ] 17:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
===You have my support=== | ===You have my support=== | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
I endorse the view that things are messed up around here. Carnildo's RfA was a travesty, and there is nothing I can say about Tony Sidaway's behavior of late that doesn't infringe ]. —] (]) 18:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | I endorse the view that things are messed up around here. Carnildo's RfA was a travesty, and there is nothing I can say about Tony Sidaway's behavior of late that doesn't infringe ]. —] (]) 18:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Agreed on both counts. I'm not sure that there's anything that could be said that wouldn't be ''seen'' by the subject as a hysterical public attack. Uh-oh, BoG, we might both be blocked now. ] 18:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | :Agreed on both counts. I'm not sure that there's anything that could be said that wouldn't be ''seen'' by the subject as a hysterical public attack. Uh-oh, BoG, we might both be blocked now. ] 18:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
::Fuck! Hope your back from your strike soon. --] (]) 18:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | ::Fuck! Hope your back from your strike soon. --] (]) 18:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 06:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 06:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
==''Signpost'' updated for October 9th.== | |||
] | |||
{| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" | |||
|- | |||
| colspan=3 | | |||
---- | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" | '''Volume 2, Issue 41''' || align ="center" | '''] ]''' || align="right" | ''']''' | |||
|- | |||
| colspan=3 align=center | | |||
---- | |||
|} | |||
{| align="center" cellspacing="20" width=90% | |||
|| ] | |||
|| ] | |||
|- | |||
|| ] | |||
|| ] | |||
|- | |||
|| ] | |||
|| ] | |||
|- | |||
|| ] | |||
|| ] | |||
|} | |||
{| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" | |||
| colspan=2 | | |||
---- | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" | ''']''' | ] | ] | ] | |||
| align = "right" | <small>] : ]</small> | |||
|- | |||
| colspan=2 | | |||
---- | |||
|} | |||
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 17:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:09, 10 October 2006
I'm leaving Misplaced Pages for a while in protest
Giano, one of our best editors has finally been driven away from Misplaced Pages, and I've decided to stop editing for a month to protest the poor treatment he has received, and the editorial climate that has allowed this. You could say I am on strike, à la mode (and no that doesn't mean "with ice cream"):
- … I simply can't imagine the amount of disrespect, unilateralism, and pettiness that has been par in the last week or two being tolerated. I have no other way, since I believe in achieving consensus, respecting the minority voices, and never trying to force my will on others, to show my displeasure aside from this. It isn't a storming away. It is a strike. Geogre,
Some things that have bothered me:
- Tony Sidaway's block of Ghirlandajo for his "defiant response" here.
- Tony Sidaway's block of Giano for being "hysterical".
ALoan expresses my thoughts well:
- … marked decrease in tolerance … I am no longer sure I know what consensus is, nor that I can trust the ArbCom and the bureaucrats to do the "right" thing. … it now seems to be a blockable offence to fully and frankly (but civilly) exchange views, or to disagree with certain admins, particularly if that disagreement is expressed in forceful (but civil) terms, and that the rules seem to change when it suits the people making the rules. ,
I encourage everyone to use my page for a constructive conversation concerning the above, and the current state of affairs on our 'pedia. I'll check back in a month. Regards all. Paul August ☎ 17:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
You have my support
People who don't even know where the articles come from are deciding that their egos' needs are greater than community, consent, consensus, and common sense, are deciding that their private beliefs are superior to the negotiated rules of the site, and are deciding that they know better than all others. For that, they deserve no articles, no input, no debate, no conversation, and no more than the isolation of their self-congratulations and self-adulation. My own strike was a labor action, and I agree with others with the same impulse. Pretty boxes and category tags and stub parades will never take the place of people willing to put their professional-level work on a volunteer project. And, if we were all replaced tomorrow, the replacements, like scabs, would soon join the desertion unless conditions were to change. Geogre 17:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- You have good points Paul. Carnildo should not have been promoted the way he was (if at all), and Tony is not one of our best admins. I can't comment anything on Giano, as I am unfamiliar with the case.
- If the current trend continues, I would also consider bailing out. So far I am left with the hope that these are just a few irregularities in an otherwise rather well-behaving community (and I think that irregularities have happened in the past too, and the ArbCom/Jimobo have taken pretty good care of the worst ones). (I hope I am right :) Good luck. Hope you come back. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
I endorse the view that things are messed up around here. Carnildo's RfA was a travesty, and there is nothing I can say about Tony Sidaway's behavior of late that doesn't infringe WP:NPA. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed on both counts. I'm not sure that there's anything that could be said that wouldn't be seen by the subject as a hysterical public attack. Uh-oh, BoG, we might both be blocked now. Jim62sch 18:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Fuck! Hope your back from your strike soon. --Salix alba (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Good luck with your break. I can't stop you going, but I think I am staying for the time being, in an effort to try to counterbalance the prevailing idiocy. I think Geogre's WP:IAA must be the way forward. Please come back in a month - enough good people have left already. -- ALoan (Talk) 19:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- I understand your decision Paul, and I also am worried by what's being done to some of our very best editors. Like ALoan and all of us, neither I can stop you from going; but I can pray you to return when the month is past, for the project would be a bleaker place without a man like you.--Aldux 21:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- I hope you'll return soon, Paul. SlimVirgin 13:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Ah, so this is where the party is; I feel a little out of place in the illustrious company here, but I feel compelled to post here after the singularly unpleasant experience of reading over the administrators' noticeboard and several other pages just now. Talented, committed writers are the heart of this project, especially now as issues of quality, not quantity, become paramount, and without them we cannot move forward. This whole episode is very discouraging, but hopefully something worthwhile can come out of it. Come back Paul, in a month or sooner; the ideal of a great 💕 still deserves all of our efforts, and this project is too valuable to abandon. --Robth 15:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm in full sympathy with Paul August's action, and yet I know it will pass quite unnoticed by Misplaced Pages's self-involved "administrators". There needs to be some kind of "sunset law", by which administrators must be "re-certified" at the end of a period: every two years at the most. --Wetman 17:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Enjoy your break, and I hope we'll see you back around in a few weeks. I can't say that I entirely agree with you - Giano and Ghirlandjo both badly needed to cool it and weren't getting the message, but at the same time, they're both good editors, and I'm fed up with people being needlessly provocative towards generally good people. Rebecca 23:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
FYI, I've sent you an email. JoshuaZ 18:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Mathematics
You will be missed on Mathematics, where I think you have helped to successfully achieve consensus as we improve the article. Stephen B Streater 18:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
I've also sent you an Email.--CSTAR 19:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
As have I. (Though the Misplaced Pages e-mail tends to be slow and unreliable at times...) Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 18th.
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 38 | 18 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
September Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
Signpost updated for September 25th.
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 39 | 25 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 2nd.
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 40 | 2 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
New speedy deletion criteria added | News and notes |
Misplaced Pages in the news | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 9th.
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 41 | 9 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)