Misplaced Pages

Talk:George W. Bush/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:George W. Bush Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:07, 5 October 2006 editAuburnPilot (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users27,289 editsm rv last edit (wasn't a to-do)← Previous edit Revision as of 05:53, 12 October 2006 edit undoANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE (talk | contribs)298 editsm environmentNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
*Forgive me if I missed this, but in reading the account of the 2000 election I did not notice a reference to Al Gore's having won the popular vote, nor any refernce to the controversy regarding Sandra Day O'Connor's alleged reaction to the early call of Florida for Gore, which if true revealed her bias and was grounds for recusing herself. Thanks] 16:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC) *Forgive me if I missed this, but in reading the account of the 2000 election I did not notice a reference to Al Gore's having won the popular vote, nor any refernce to the controversy regarding Sandra Day O'Connor's alleged reaction to the early call of Florida for Gore, which if true revealed her bias and was grounds for recusing herself. Thanks] 16:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
*As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. ] 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC) *As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. ] 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
*Section on environmental issues<!-- atrocities -->. --] 05:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:53, 12 October 2006

  • By taking the policies on WP:BLP seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{fact}}-tagging all unsourced claims HJ 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Forgive me if I missed this, but in reading the account of the 2000 election I did not notice a reference to Al Gore's having won the popular vote, nor any refernce to the controversy regarding Sandra Day O'Connor's alleged reaction to the early call of Florida for Gore, which if true revealed her bias and was grounds for recusing herself. ThanksMikekev58 16:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. St.isaac 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Section on environmental issues. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 05:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)